Cited by 84Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Dissociation and Posttraumatic Stress 1 Year After the World Trade Center Disaster: Follow-Up of a Longitudinal Survey

Simeon, Daphne, Greenberg, Jennifer, Nelson, Dorothy, Schmeidler, James, Hollander, Eric·2005·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a 1-year follow-up of an original mail survey of early reactions to the World Trade Center disaster. METHOD: Of the 75 subjects originally surveyed, 58 (77%) responded. The survey included measures of dissociation (Dissociative Experiences Scale, Cambridge Depersonalization Scale, Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale), post-traumatic stress (Impact of Event Scale-Revised), social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-short form), and a life quality measure (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-short form). We hypothesized that dissociative versus posttraumatic symptoms at follow-up could be dissected on the basis of early reactions. RESULTS: Responders and nonresponders did not differ in baseline characteristics. Exposure was not associated with dissociation or posttraumatic stress at follow-up. Of distress, dissociation, and posttraumatic stress at baseline, baseline dissociation was the strongest predictor of outcome dissociation while baseline posttraumatic stress was the strongest predictor of outcome posttraumatic stress. Of 4 peritraumatic distress factors generated in the original survey, "loss of control" and "guilt/shame" were significantly related to dissociation and posttraumatic stress at outcome, while "helplessness/anger" was only associated with posttraumatic stress at outcome. Lesser improvement in posttraumatic stress over the first year was significantly related to less social support and greater comorbid dissociation. Interim social support was associated with better life quality and fewer symptoms at outcome. CONCLUSION: There was evidence for partly independent pathways toward dissociation versus posttraumatic stress 1 year after the disaster. Feelings of guilt and shame, and persistent dissociation, were poor prognostic factors, while social support had a powerful ameliorating influence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v66n0212

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simeon, D., Greenberg, J., Nelson, D., Schmeidler, J., & Hollander, E.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2005-02-15
Volume
66
Issue
02
Pages
231-237
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046086346
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
World Trade Center disaster, dissociation, post-traumatic stress, peritraumatic dissociation, loss of control, social support, quality of life, prognostic factors, disaster exposure, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Disasters, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New York City, Personal Satisfaction, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, September 11 Terrorist Attacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review