Cited by 159Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMedicine, History, and PhilosophyTreatment of Major Depression

Assessing demoralization and depression in the setting of medical disease

Open access
Mangelli, Lara, Fava, Giovanni A., Grandi, Silvana, Grassi, Luigi, Ottolini, Fedra, Porcelli, Piero, Rafanelli, Chiara, Rigatelli, Marco +1 more·2005·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the presence of demoralization and major depression in the setting of medical disease. METHOD: 807 consecutive outpatients recruited from different medical settings (gastroenterology, cardiology, endocrinology, and oncology) were assessed according to DSM-IV criteria and Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research, using semistructured research interviews. RESULTS: Demoralization was identified in 245 patients (30.4%), while major depression was present in 135 patients (16.7%). Even though there was a considerable overlap between the 2 diagnoses, 59 patients (43.7%) with major depression were not classified as demoralized, and 169 patients (69.0%) with demoralization did not satisfy the criteria for major depression. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a high prevalence of demoralization in the medically ill and the feasibility of a differentiation between demoralization and depression. Further research may determine whether demoralization, alone or in association with major depression, entails prognostic and clinical implications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v66n0317

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mangelli, L., Fava, G. A., Grandi, S., Grassi, L., Ottolini, F., Porcelli, P., Rafanelli, C., Rigatelli, M., & Sonino, N.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2005-03-15
Volume
66
Issue
03
Pages
391-394
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170980087
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
demoralization, major depressive disorder, disease, psychiatric comorbidity, prevalence, psychosomatic medicine, diagnostic overlap
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Status, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review