Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Texas Implementation of Medication Algorithms: Update to the Algorithms for Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder

Suppes, Trisha, Dennehy, Ellen B., Hirschfeld, Robert M. A., Altshuler, Lori L., Bowden, Charles L., Calabrese, Joseph R., Crismon, M. Lynn, Ketter, Terence A., Sachs, Gary S., Swann, Alan C., Texas Consensus Conference Panel on Medication Treatment of Bipolar Disorder·2005·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
DOI 10.4088/jcp.v66n0710
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A panel consisting of academic psychiatrists and pharmacist administrators of the Texas Department of State Health Services (formerly Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation), community mental health physicians, advocates, and consumers met in May 2004 to review new evidence in the pharmacologic treatment of bipolar I disorder (BDI). The goal of the consensus conference was to update and revise the current treatment algorithm for BDI as part of the Texas Implementation of Medication Algorithms, a statewide quality assurance program for the treatment of major psychiatric illness. The guidelines for evaluating possible medications, the criteria for selection and ranking, and the updated algorithms are described. METHOD: Principles from previous consensus conferences were reviewed and amended. Medication algorithms for the acute treatment of hypomanic/manic or mixed and depressive episodes in BDI were developed after examining recent efficacy and safety and tolerability data. Recommendations for maintenance treatments were developed. RESULTS: The panel updated the 2 primary algorithms (hypomanic/manic/mixed and depressive) based on clinical evidence for efficacy, tolerability, and safety developed since 2000. Expert consensus was utilized where clinical evidence was limited. Prevention of new episodes or prophylaxis treatment recommendations were developed based on recent data from longer-term trials. Maintenance recommendations are provided as levels versus a specified staged algorithm, as for acute treatment, due to the relatively limited database to inform treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These algorithms for the treatment of BDI represent the recommendations based on the most recent evidence available. These recommendations are meant to provide a framework for clinical decision making, not to replace clinical judgment. As with any algorithm, treatment practices will evolve beyond the recommendations of this consensus conference as new evidence and additional medications become available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v66n0710

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Suppes, T., Dennehy, E. B., Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Altshuler, L. L., Bowden, C. L., Calabrese, J. R., Crismon, M. L., Ketter, T. A., Sachs, G. S., Swann, A. C., & Disorder, T. C. C. P. O. M. T. O. B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Publisher
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
Published
2005-07-15
Volume
66
Issue
07
Pages
870-886
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4088/jcp.v66n0710
OpenAlex
W2170351165
Cited by
330
References
15
FWCI
18.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Texas Implementation of Medication Algorithms: Update to the Algorithms for Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v66n0710
The paper
Suppes, T., Dennehy, E. B., Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Altshuler, L. L., Bowden, C. L., Calabrese, J. R., Crismon, M. L., Ketter, T. A., Sachs, G. S., Swann, A. C., & Disorder, T. C. C. P. O. M. T. O. B. (2005). The Texas Implementation of Medication Algorithms: Update to the Algorithms for Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v66n0710

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.