Cited by 559Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Efficacy of Quetiapine Monotherapy in Bipolar I and II Depression: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study (The BOLDER II Study)

Thase, Michael E., Macfadden, Wayne, Weisler, Richard H., Chang, William, Paulsson, Björn, Khan, Arifulla, Calabrese, Joseph R.·2006·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine monotherapy for depressive episodes in patients with bipolar I or II disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) who were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine (300 or 600 mg/d; once daily, evening dosing) or placebo. Patients were assessed weekly using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The primary end point was change in MADRS total score from baseline to Week 8 (analysis of covariance/last-observation-carried-forward analysis). Of 509 patients randomized, 59% completed the study. Improvements from baseline in mean MADRS total scores were significantly greater with quetiapine 300 and 600 mg/d than with placebo from first evaluation (Week 1) through Week 8 (both P <or= 0.001 vs. placebo). Therapeutic effect sizes at Week 8 were 0.61 and 0.54 for quetiapine 300 and 600 mg/d, respectively. Improvements in mean HAM-D scores were also significantly greater with both quetiapine doses than with placebo (P < 0.001) as early as Week 1 and throughout the study. The MADRS response and remission rates were also significantly greater in both quetiapine dose groups compared with placebo. Improvements in primary and secondary outcomes were observed with both 300 and 600 mg/d quetiapine without major differences between the doses. Common adverse events included dry mouth, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, and constipation. The incidence of treatment-emergent mania or hypomania was lower with quetiapine treatment than placebo. This study demonstrates that quetiapine monotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for depressive episodes in bipolar disorder, confirming the results observed from a previous study (BipOLar DEpRession [BOLDER] I).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jcp.0000248603.76231.b7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aripiprazole trials excluded patients with psychotic features; bipolar II patients were only enrolled in quetiapine studies (32-34%); no trials excluded rapid cycling, which represented 18-40% of patients in studies reporting such data.

    “The aripiprazole trials (Thase et al. 2008) excluded patients with psychotic features and bipolar II patients were only enrolled in the quetiapine studies (32-34 %) ; no trials excluded patients with rapid cycling, which represented 18-40 % of patients in the studies reporting such data”
  • Quetiapine and olanzapine as monotherapy were significantly more efficacious than placebo, as indicated by greater reductions in MADRS scores, in the treatment of acute bipolar depression from week 1 onwards.

    “Some modern antipsychotics (quetiapine and olanzapine) have demonstrated efficacy in bipolar depressive patients from week 1 onwards.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thase, M. E., Macfadden, W., Weisler, R. H., Chang, W., Paulsson, B., Khan, A., & Calabrese, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
Thase, Michael E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
600-609
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995358122
Cited by
559
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
FWCI
32.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
quetiapine, bipolar depression, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, monotherapy, antidepressant efficacy, tolerability, treatment-emergent mania, hypomania, dose comparison, adverse events
MeSH terms
Quetiapine Fumarate, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Dibenzothiazepines, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Least-Squares Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review