Cited by 22Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Early Symptomatic Worsening During Treatment With Fluoxetine in Major Depressive Disorder: Prevalence and Implications

Cusin, Cristina, Fava, Maurizio, Amsterdam, Jay D., Quitkin, Frederic M., Reimherr, Frederick W., Beasley, Charles M., Rosenbaum, Jerrold F., Perlis, Roy H.·2007·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients experience worsening of depressed mood after beginning antidepressant treatment, which could represent the natural history of the illness or a treatment-related effect. While patterns of response have been examined as possible predictors of outcome, the clinical correlates and implications of early worsening per se have not been investigated. METHOD: In a post hoc analysis, we studied the clinical correlates of early worsening in a large sample of outpatients (N = 694) diagnosed with a DSM-III-R-defined major depressive episode and treated with fluoxetine (20 mg/day) for up to 12 weeks. We defined early worsening as an increase of at least 5 points on a modified 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (mHAM-D, including reverse vegetative symptoms) compared to the previous visit, and occurring during the acute phase of treatment. The primary analysis compared remission and response at week 12 between those patients with and without worsening. RESULTS: In our sample, 211 patients (30.4%) experienced early worsening of depression. An increase in mHAM-D score at week 2, 3, 4, or 6 was associated with a significantly lower probability of remission and response at both week 8 and week 12, while no significant difference was observed in study discontinuation. Baseline features, including gender, age, mHAM-D score at entry, number of previous depressive episodes, and duration of illness were not associated with the development of early worsening during fluoxetine treatment. CONCLUSION: Early clinical worsening is common and associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving remission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v68n0107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cusin, C., Fava, M., Amsterdam, J. D., Quitkin, F. M., Reimherr, F. W., Beasley, C. M., Rosenbaum, J. F., & Perlis, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2007-01-15
Volume
68
Issue
01
Pages
52-57
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056881294
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH067060)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fluoxetine, major depressive disorder, early treatment response, remission, treatment response prediction, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, outpatients, antidepressant side effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Trials as Topic, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review