The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persistent Neuropsychological Deficit in Euthymic Bipolar Patients: Executive Function as a Core Deficit
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize neuropsychological deficits during the euthymic phase in a sample of bipolar outpatients treated with lithium as the principal mood-stabilizer medication. We sought to determine cognitive functioning of typical bipolar outpatients treated in clinical settings. METHOD: Forty-four stable outpatients, fulfilling criteria of bipolar disorder (DSM-IV), were consecutively recruited from a defined catchment area and compared with 46 healthy matched controls in 2003. Patients were remitted for at least 3 months and euthymic (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score < 8 and Young Mania Rating Scale score < 6 for at least 3 months). They were receiving lithium as monotherapy (45.5%) or combined with other psychotropic medication (54.5%). Neuropsychological assessment was performed by means of a neuropsychological test battery tapping into the main cognitive domains (executive function, attention, processing speed, verbal memory, and visual memory). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance showed that euthymic bipolar patients performed significantly worse than controls in measures of executive function (F = 2.57, df = 4,82; p = .04) and inhibition (F = 3.83, df = 2,84; p = .03), after controlling for subclinical symptomatology, years of education, and premorbid intelligence quotient. Processing speed also differed significantly between groups (F = 3.73, df = 2,84; p = .03). The subgroup of patients on lithium monotherapy (45.5%) differed significantly from healthy matched controls on tasks of lack of inhibition (F = 5.8, df = 2,36; p = .007). Executive tasks showed between-subject effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that impaired executive function and loss of inhibition might be an important feature of bipolar disorder regardless of the severity of the disease or the effects of medication. Also, these executive-type cognitive traits may constitute an endophenotype for further studies on the etiology of bipolar disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Posner, J., Polanczyk, G. V., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33004-1 · Cited by 835
Kurtz, M. M., & Gerraty, R. T. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0016277 · Cited by 433
Systematic review of the neural basis of social cognition in patients with mood disorders
Cusi, A. M., Nazarov, A., Holshausen, K., MacQueen, G. M., & McKinnon, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.100179 · Cited by 278
Cullen, B., Ward, J., Graham, N. A., Deary, I. J., Pell, J. P., Smith, D. J., & Evans, J. J. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.063 · Cited by 231
Kapczinski, F., Magalhães, P. V. S., Balanzá‐Martinez, V., Dias, V. V., Frangou, S., Gama, C. S., Gonzalez‐Pinto, A., Grande, I., Ha, K., Kauer‐Sant'Anna, M., et al. (2014) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12305 · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mur, M., Portella, M. J., Martínez-Arán, A., Pifarré, J., & Vieta, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2007-07-15
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 1078-1086
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036814613
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistent Neuropsychological Deficit in Euthymic Bipolar Patients: Executive Function as a Core Deficit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v68n0715
- The paper
- Mur, M., Portella, M. J., Martínez-Arán, A., Pifarré, J., & Vieta, E. (2007). Persistent Neuropsychological Deficit in Euthymic Bipolar Patients: Executive Function as a Core Deficit. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v68n0715
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.