Cited by 27Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

Bisoniana LXVIII. Comparative winter bioenergetics of American bison, yak, Scottish highland and Hereford calves

Open access
Christopherson, R. J., Hudson, R. J., Richmond, R. J.·1978·Acta Theriologica

Abstract

American bison, yak, Scottish Highland and Hereford calves were used in a comparative study of metabolic responses to temperature of 20, 0 and -30°C. Metabolic rates were lowest in the bison, highest in the Herefords and intermediate in the Highland and yak. Przeprowadzono porównawcze badania nad zapotrzebowaniem energetycznym u bizona, jaka oraz bydła (ras - Scottish Highland i Hereford) w temperaturach 20, 0 i -30°C (Tabela 1). Tempo metabolizmu było najniższe u bizona, najwyższe u bydła rasy Hereford, a pośrednie u jaka i bydła rasy Scottish Highland (Tabela 2).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4098/at.arch.78-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike some other species of Bos, yaks possess physiological adaptations to the extreme conditions of high elevation, high solar radiation, low temperature, and aridity under which they live.

    “Unlikesome other species of Bos, yaks possess physiological adaptations to the extreme conditions of high elevation, high solar radiation, low temperature, and aridity under which they live (Christopherson et al. 1978;Prasad 1997;Wiener et al. 2003).”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Christopherson et al. 1978

    The comparative winter bioenergetics results (Table 3; article pp. 49–54) show that yak calves had greater thermal insulation than Hereford calves, supporting a difference relevant to cold conditions. The paper describes yaks as living in cold mountainous environments, but does not establish physiological adaptations to high elevation, high solar radiation, or aridity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christopherson, R. J., Hudson, R. J., & Richmond, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Acta Theriologica
Published
1978-03-10
Volume
23
Pages
49-54
ISSN
  • 0001-7051 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-3743
OpenAlex
W2013893770
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACTA THERIOLOGICA (publishedVersion)
  • RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
American bison, yak, Hereford cattle, calves, metabolic rate, cold exposure, energy requirements, comparative physiology, thermoregulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review