Cited by 6Educational Theory and Curriculum StudiesHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentEducational Methods and Analysis

Research in curriculum studies: Reflections on nomadic thought for advancing the field

Open access
Simmonds, Shan, Le Grange, Lesley·2019·Transformation in Higher Education

Abstract

Background: Key to sustainability and expansion of any field is the intellectual works of its scholars who engage in their field as in-becoming and who continually strive towards its advancement. For researchers of curriculum studies this involves being knowledgeable and conversant of the underlying discourses framing and challenging the field. Aim: In South Africa, field of curriculum studies has been critiqued for being a quick-fix solution to social problems by merely approaching the curriculum as a ‘dumping ground’ and for its over-emphasis on curriculum as a schooling matter. The intent of this article was to exemplify other, more current, challenges and accomplishments of the research constituting the field. Setting: The publications of South African National Research Foundation-rated researchers specialising in curriculum, because their scholarship is deemed central to building societal knowledge through quality and high-impact research. Methods: A meta-study was conducted to determine trends in a particular cluster of publications to identify the ways that researchers are advancing in the field of curriculum studies in South Africa. Results: Four pertinent findings were evidenced. Firstly, strong localism/nationalism of the field. Secondly, the higher education context as highly researched. Thirdly, the multidisciplinary nature of South African curriculum studies research. Fourthly, strong impetus from sociological work in the field. Conclusion: We reflect on nomadic thought as a starting point central to the pursuits of researchers in advancing the field of curriculum studies as an intellectual activity and practice of complicated conversation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4102/the.v4i0.76

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Simmonds, S., & Le Grange, L.
Affiliations
North-West University (ZA)
Venue
Transformation in Higher Education
Publisher
AOSIS
Published
2019-11-21
Volume
4
ISSN
2415-0991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990124490
Cited by
6
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transformation in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University) (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Analysis
Keywords
curriculum studies, nomadic thought, disciplinary development, research trends, higher education research, multidisciplinarity, sociology of curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review