Cited by 664Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research

Paterson, Barbara, Thorne, Sally, Canam, Connie, Jillings, Carol·2001·Sage eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412985017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of authors suggest drawing on the sampling techniques of primary qualitative research, including principles of theoretical sampling and theoretical saturation, when conducting a synthesis of qualitative literature.

    “A number of authors [18-20] suggest drawing on the sampling techniques of primary qualitative research, including principles of theoretical sampling and theoretical saturation, when conducting a synthesis of qualitative literature.”
  • Only those studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria in some clear and uncontestable manner were excluded, to minimize the risk of relevant studies being discarded.

    “Only those studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria in some clear and uncontestable manner were excluded, to minimize the risk of relevant studies being discarded (Paterson et al., 2001).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paterson, B., Thorne, S., Canam, C., & Jillings, C.
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
2001
OpenAlex
W2485332637
Cited by
664
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 27
FWCI
20.80
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
meta-study, qualitative health research, qualitative evidence synthesis, evidence synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review