The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glutathione as an antioxidant in inorganic mercury-induced nephrotoxicity
Abstract
Heavy metal toxicity represents an uncommon but clinically significant medical condition, which if unrecognized or inappropriately treated results in significant morbidity and mortality. Among heavy metals, mercury is recognized as a potent and widely distributed toxicant having the ability to accumulate at various levels of food chain besides possessing ability to cross placental and blood-brain barrier. Symptom picture of mercury (Hg 2+ ) toxicity is characterized mainly by a series of renal disorders. Mechanism of inorganic mercury toxicity includes production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) capable of damaging lipids in membrane, proteins or enzymes in tissues, and DNA to induce oxidative stress as balance between generation, and elimination of ROS is essential for maintaining the functional integrity of a cell. Mitigation of endogenous mercury depends as a part on the presence of antioxidants such as glutathione - most abundant intracellular non-protein thiol that plays a central role in the maintenance of cellular redox status by quenching free radicals generated during oxidative stress. Ability of a cell to survive the threat posed by endogenous mercury represents a biological adaptation fundamental to survival. This review describes the current understanding and the mechanisms involved by different forms of mercury in eliciting their toxicity in kidney along with the knowledge of major intracellular reductant that plays important role in the mitigation of mercury toxicity for the maintenance of homeostasis within the body of living organisms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excessive consumption of heavy metal-contaminated vegetables may cause carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic, and teratogenic effects and serious health risks.
“Previous studies found that excessive consumption of heavy metalcontaminated vegetables may cause carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic, and teratogenic effects on human health, leading to serious health risks like Alzheimer's in adults, intellectual disability in children, DNS (deviated nasal septum), insomnia, kidney, and liver diseases, and more”
From Assessment of heavy metals accumulation by vegetables irrigated with different stages of textile wastewater for evaluation of food and health risk (2024) · cites this paper as Jan et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Metals, Toxicity and Oxidative Stress
Valko, M., Morris, H., & Cronin, M. (2005) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867053764635 · Cited by 5,018
The toxicology of mercury—current exposures and clinical manifestations
Clarkson, T. W., Magos, L., & Myers, G. J. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra022471 · Cited by 1,766
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Barkay, 2003, Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 27, 355, 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00046-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Clarkson, 2006, The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds, Crit Rev Toxicol, 36, 609, 10.1080/10408440600845619 · DOI
- Quilbe, 2004, Combinatory chemical and biological approaches to investigate metal elements in agricultural runoff water, J Environ Qual, 33, 149, 10.2134/jeq2004.1490 · DOI
- Jan, 2009, Mercury pollution: An emerging problem and potential bacterial remediation strategies, World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 25, 1529, 10.1007/s11274-009-0050-2 · DOI
- Nicholson, 1983, Cadmium and mercury nephrotoxity, Nature, 304, 633, 10.1038/304633a0 · DOI
- Genestra, 2007, Oxyl radicals, redox sensitive signalling cascades and antioxidants, Cell Signal, 19, 1807, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Poulden, 2002, Mercury: Is it elemental my dear Watson?, Emerg Med J, 19, 82, 10.1136/emj.19.1.82 · DOI
- Morel, 1998, Chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury, Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 29, 543, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.543 · DOI
- Guzzi, 2008, Molecular mechanisms triggered by mercury, Toxicology, 244, 1, 10.1016/j.tox.2007.11.002 · DOI
- Counter, 2004, Mercury exposure in children: A review, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 198, 209, 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.032 · DOI
- Ng, 2007, Low level chronic mercury exposure in children and adolescents: Meta-analysis, Pediatr Int, 49, 80, 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02303.x · DOI
- Zalups, 1994, Advances in understanding renal transport and toxicity of mercury, J Toxicol Environ Health, 42, 1, 10.1080/15287399409531861 · DOI
- Magos, 2006, Overview of clinical toxicity of mercury, Ann Clin Biochem, 43, 257, 10.1258/000456306777695654 · DOI · Paper page
- Ballatori, 2002, Transport of toxic metals by molecular mimicry, Environ Health Perspect, 110, 689, 10.1289/ehp.02110s5689 · DOI
- Zalups, 2000, Molecular intereactions with mercury in the kidney, Pharmacol Rev, 52, 113, 10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01438-8 · DOI
- Kerper, 1996, Methylmercury efflux from brain capillary endothelial cells is modulated by intracellular glutathione but not ATP, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 141, 526, 10.1006/taap.1996.0318 · DOI
- Lund, 1993, Studies on mercury (II) induced H 2 O 2 formation and oxidative stress invivo and invitro in rat kidney mitochondria, Biochem Pharmacol, 45, 2017, 10.1016/0006-2952(93)90012-L · DOI
- Kim, 2003, Cytotoxicity of inorganic mercury in murine T and B lymphoma cell lines: Involvement of reactive oxygen species, Ca2+ homeostasis and cytokine gene expression, Toxicol In Vitro, 17, 385, 10.1016/S0887-2333(03)00040-7 · DOI
- Goering, 2002, Effect of mercury vapour inhalation on reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes in rat brain and kidney are minimal, J Appl Toxicol, 22, 167, 10.1002/jat.844 · DOI
- Miller, 1993, Redox activities of mercury thiol complexes: Implications for mercury induced porphyria and toxicity, Chem Biol Interact, 88, 23, 10.1016/0009-2797(93)90082-A · DOI
- Rothstein, 1964, Turnover of mercury in rats exposed repeatedly to inhalation of vapour, Health Phys, 10, 1099, 10.1097/00004032-196412000-00031 · DOI
- Avery, 2001, Metal toxicity in yeasts and role of oxidative stress, Adv Appl Microbiol, 49, 111, 10.1016/S0065-2164(01)49011-3 · DOI
- Meister, 1988, Glutathione metabolism and its selective modification, J Biol Chem, 263, 17205, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)77815-6 · DOI
- Biswas, 2009, Environmental toxicity, redox signalling and lung inflammation: Role of glutathione, Mol Aspects Med, 30, 60, 10.1016/j.mam.2008.07.001 · DOI
- Valko, 2006, Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress induced cancer, Chem Biol Interact, 160, 1, 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
- James, 2005, Thimerosol neurotoxicity is associated with glutathione depletion: Protection with glutathione precursors, Neurotoxicology, 26, 1, 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.07.012 · DOI
- Becker, 2009, The role of intracellular glutathione in inorganic mercury-induced toxicity in neuroblastoma cells, Neurochem Res, 34, 1677, 10.1007/s11064-009-9962-3 · DOI
- Eto, 1999, Differential diagnosis between organic and inorganic mercury poisoning in human cases - Pathologic point of view, Toxicol Pathol, 27, 664, 10.1177/019262339902700608 · DOI · Paper page
- Mates, 2008, Intracellular redox status and oxidative stress: Implications for cell proliferation, apoptosis and carcinogenesis, Arch Toxicol, 82, 273, 10.1007/s00204-008-0304-z · DOI
- Gilbert, 1982, Biological disulfides: The third messenger? Modulation of phosphofructokinase activity by thiol/disulfide exchange, J Biol Chem, 257, 12086, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33682-2 · DOI
- Ondarza, 1989, Enzyme regulation by biological disulfides, Biosci Rep, 9, 593, 10.1007/BF01119803 · DOI
- Gstraunthaler, 1983, Glutathione depletion and invitro lipid peroxidation in mercury or maleate induced acute renal failure, Biochem Pharmacol, 32, 2969, 10.1016/0006-2952(83)90404-5 · DOI
- Lund, 1991, Mercury induced H 2 O 2 production and lipid peroxidation invitro in rat kidney mitochondria, Biochem Pharamacol, 42, S181, 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90408-W · DOI
- Quig, 1998, Cysteine metabolism and metal toxicity, Altern Med Rev, 3, 262
- Goyer, 1997, Toxic and essential metal interactions, Annu Rev Nutr, 17, 37, 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.37 · DOI
- Leong, 2001, Retrograde degeneration of neurite membrane structural integrity of nerve growth cones following invitro exposure to mercury, Neuroreport, 12, 733, 10.1097/00001756-200103260-00024 · DOI
- De-Ceaurriz, 1994, Role of extracellular glutathione and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase in disposition and kidney toxicity of inorganic mercury in rats, J Appl Toxicol, 14, 201, 10.1002/jat.2550140310 · DOI
- Tanaka, 1990, Role of g-glutamyltranspeptidase in renal uptake and toxicity of inorganic mercury in mice, Toxicology, 60, 187, 10.1016/0300-483X(90)90142-4 · DOI
- Zalups, 1995, Luminal and basolateral mechanisms involved in renal tubular uptake of inorganic mercury, J Toxicol Environ Health, 46, 73, 10.1080/15287399509532019 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hassan, J., Rajib, M. M. R., Khan, M. N.-E.-A., Khandaker, S., Zubayer, M., Ashab, K. R., Kuba, T., Marwani, H. M., Asiri, A. M., Hasan, M. M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120206 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Jan, A., Ali, A., & Haq, Q.
- Venue
- Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-77
- ISSN
- 0022-3859
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review