Cited by 203Antibiotic Use and ResistancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Self-medication practice among undergraduate medical students in a tertiary care medical college, West Bengal

Open access
Banerjee, I, Bhadury, T·2012·Journal of Postgraduate Medicine

Abstract

Background Self-medication is a widely prevalent practice in India. It assumes a special significance among medical students as they are the future medical practitioners. Aim To assess the pattern of self-medication practice among undergraduate medical students. Settings and design Tertiary care medical college in West Bengal, India. Material and methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among the undergraduate medical students. Results Out of 500 students of the institute, 482 consented for the study and filled in the supplied questionnaire. Fourteen incomplete questionnaires were excluded and the remaining 468 analyzed. It was found that 267 (57.05%) respondents practiced self-medication. The principal morbidities for seeking self-medication included cough and common cold as reported by 94 students (35.21%) followed by diarrhea (68 students) (25.47%), fever (42 students) (15.73%), headache (40 students) (14.98%) and pain abdomen due to heartburn/ peptic ulcer (23 students) (8.61%). Drugs/ drug groups commonly used for self-medication included antibiotics (31.09%) followed by analgesics (23.21%), antipyretics (17.98%), antiulcer agents (8.99%), cough suppressant (7.87%), multivitamins (6.37%) and antihelminthics (4.49%). Among reasons for seeking self-medication, 126 students (47.19%) felt that their illness was mild while 76 (28.46%) preferred as it is time-saving. About 42 students (15.73%) cited cost-effectiveness as the primary reason while 23 (8.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0022-3859.97175

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, I., & Bhadury, T.
Affiliations
  • Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital (IN)
  • AMRI Hospitals (IN)
Venue
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Published
2012
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
127-131
ISSN
0022-3859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095331730
Cited by
200
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Postgraduate Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
self-medication, medical students, undergraduate medical education, antibiotic use, analgesics, antipyretics, antitussive agents, reasons for self-medication, health education
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Nonprescription Drugs, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Medical, Self Medication, Students, Medical, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review