Cited by 37Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender and Technology in Education

The Relationships Between Self-Efficacy, Internet Addiction and Shame

Open access
Craparo, Giuseppe, Messina, Roberta, Severino, Sergio, Fasciano, Silvia, Cannella, Vincenza, Gori, Alessio, Cacioppo, Marco, Baiocco, Roberto·2014·Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internet addiction (IAD) is one of the most diffuse mental disorders among adolescents. AIMS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationships between shame, self-efficacy and Internet addiction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited a total of 670 college students (males = 164, 24.5%; females = 506, 75.5%). The subjects were aged between 18 and 36 years (M = 20.93, SD = 2.52; males: M = 21.43, SD = 2.95; females: M = 20.76, SD = 2.35). We administered the following instruments: Experience of Shame Scale; Perceived Social Self-Efficacy Scale - Adult Version; Perceived Self-Efficacy in Handling Negative Emotions Scales; Internet Addiction Test. STATISTICS ANALYSIS: We applied multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA), Pearson's correlation indices and linear regression analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found a significant inter-relation between Internet addiction and shame. Shame could be a good predictor of Internet addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0253-7176.135386

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Joinson AN Gackenbach J Causes and effects of disinhibition on the internet The Psychology of the Internet 1998 New York Academic Press 43 60

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craparo, G., Messina, R., Severino, S., Fasciano, S., Cannella, V., Gori, A., Cacioppo, M., & Baiocco, R.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • CIPA Meridionale
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Craparo, Giuseppe
Venue
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-07
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
304-307
ISSN
  • 0253-7176 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-1564
OpenAlex
W1989040482
Cited by
37
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
internet addiction, shame, self-efficacy, social self-efficacy, negative emotion regulation, university students, adolescents, predictors of internet addiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review