Cited by 754Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging and AnalysisBrain Tumor Detection and Classification

Automated medical image segmentation techniques

Open access
Sharma, Neeraj, Aggarwal, LalitM·2010·Journal of Medical Physics

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of medical images is a key step in contouring during radiotherapy planning. Computed topography (CT) and Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are the most widely used radiographic techniques in diagnosis, clinical studies and treatment planning. This review provides details of automated segmentation methods, specifically discussed in the context of CT and MR images. The motive is to discuss the problems encountered in segmentation of CT and MR images, and the relative merits and limitations of methods currently available for segmentation of medical images.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0971-6203.58777

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Prince JL Links JM Medical imaging signals and system Pearson Education 2006
  2. [7]Gonzalez RC Woods RE Digital image processing 2004 2nd ed Pearson Education
  3. [9]Pal NR Pal SH A review on image segmentation techniques Pattern Recog 1993 26 1277 94
  4. [11]Ramesh N Yoo JH Sethi IK Thresholding based on histogram approximation IEEE Proc Vision Image Signal Proc 1995 142 271 9
  5. [12]Sharma N Ray AK Computer aided segmentation of medical images based on hybridized approach of edge and region based techniques Proc. of Int. Conf. on Mathematical Biology' 2006 Mathematical Biology recent trends by ANAMAYA Publishers 150 5
  6. [18]Hancock ER Kittler J Edge labeling using dictionary-based relaxation IEEE Trans PAMI 1990 12 165 81
  7. [20]Law T Itoh H Seki H Image filtering, edge detection, and edge tracing using fuzzy reasoning IEEE Trans PAMI 1996 18 481 91
  8. [21]Ney H A comparative study of two search strategies for connected word recognition Dynamic programming and heuristic search IEEE Trans PAMI 1992 14 586 95
  9. [25]Ng HP Ong SH Foong KW Nowinski WL An improved watershed algorithm for medical image segmentation Proceedings 12th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 2005
  10. [26]Nguyen HT Worring M Boomgaard RV Watersnakes: Energy-driven watershed segmentation IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intellig 2003 25 330 42
  11. [27]Najman L Schmitti M Geodesic saliency of watershed contours and hierarchical segmentation IEEE Trans PAMI 1996 18 12
  12. [28]Lopez AM Evaluation of methods for ridge and valley detection IEEE Trans PAMI 1999 21 327
  13. [29]Gevers T Smeulders AW Combining region splitting and edge detection through guided Delaunay image subdivision Comp Vision Pattern Recognition IEEE Computer Society 1997 Los Almitos, CA 1021 6
  14. [30]Haralick RM Statistical and structural approaches to texture Proc IEEE 1979 67 786 804
  15. [32]Fukunaga K Introduction to statistical pattern recognition 1990 2nd ed Academic Press
  16. [33]Pavilidis T Chang SK Fu KS Structural description and graph grammar Pictorial information systems 1980 Springer Verlag Berlin 86 103
  17. [35]Haralick RM Shanmugan K Dinstein I Textural features for image classification IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973 3 610 22
  18. [36]Chu CC Aggarwal JK The integration of image segmentation maps using region and edge information IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intellig 1993 15 1241 52
  19. [37]Chaudhuri BB Sarkar N Texture segmentation using fractal dimension IEEE Trans PAMI 1995 17 72 7
  20. [39]Duda RO Hart PE Stork DG Pattern classification 2001 Singapore Wiley 350 93
  21. [49]Jain AK Duin RP Mao J Statistical pattern recognition: A review IEEE Trans PAMI 2000 22 4 37
  22. [51]Frigui H Krishnapuram R A robust competitive clustering algorithm with application in computer vision IEEE Trans PAMI 1999 21 450 65
  23. [53]Bandyopadhyay S Simulated annealing using a reversible jump markov chain monte carlo algorithm for fuzzy clustering IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Engg 2005 17 479 90
  24. [72]Pham DL Prince JL An adaptive fuzzy c-means algorithm for image segmentation in the presence of intensity in homogeneities Pattern Rec Letters 1999 14 57 68

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, N., & Aggarwal, L.
Affiliations
Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Neeraj
Venue
Journal of Medical Physics
Published
2010
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
0971-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294305479
Cited by
754
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
16.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Keywords
medical image segmentation, automatic segmentation, radiotherapy treatment planning, contouring, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, segmentation challenge, segmentation algorithm comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review