The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on polypharmacy and use of inappropriate medications
Open accessAbstract
In the past, polypharmacy was referred to the mixing of many drugs in one prescription. Today polypharmacy implies to the prescription of too many medications for an individual patient, with an associated higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and interactions. Situations certainly exist where the combination therapy or polytherapy is the used for single disease condition. Polypharmacy is a problem of substantial importance, in terms of both direct medication costs and indirect medication costs resulting from drug-related morbidity. Polypharmacy increases the risk of side effects and interactions. Moreover it is a preventable problem. A retrospective study was carried out at Bhopal district (Capital of Madhya Pradesh, India) in the year of September-November 2009 by collecting prescriptions of consultants at various levels of health care. The tendency of polypharmacy was studied and analyzed under the various heads in the survey. Available data suggests that polypharmacy is a widespread problem, and physician, clinical pharmacists and patients are all responsible. These risks can be minimized through identifying the prevalence of this potential problem in a high-risk population and by increasing awareness among patients and healthcare professionals. Physicians and clinical pharmacists have the potential to combating this problem through a variety of interventions such as reducing the number of medications taken, reducing the number of doses taken, increasing patient adherence, preventing ADRs, improving patient quality of life and decreasing facility and drug costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kaufman, D. W., Kelly, J. P., Rosenberg, L., Anderson, T. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.3.337 · Cited by 1,845
Aminzadeh, F., & Dalziel, W. B. (2002) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1067/mem.2002.121523 · Cited by 1,119
Cited by
Polypharmacy among the elderly
Zabihi, A., Hosseini, S., Jafarian Amiri, S., & Bijani, A. (2018) · Journal of Mid-life Health · doi:10.4103/jmh.jmh_87_17 · Cited by 60
Cheng, S., Siddiqui, T. G., Gossop, M., Kristoffersen, E. S., & Lundqvist, C. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031483 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Rambhade, S., Shrivastava, A., Rambhade, A., Chakarborty, A., & Patil, U.
- Venue
- Toxicology International
- Publisher
- Informatics Publishing Limited
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68
- ISSN
- 0971-6580 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017665423
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on polypharmacy and use of inappropriate medications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/0971-6580.94506
- The paper
- Rambhade, S., Shrivastava, A., Rambhade, A., Chakarborty, A., & Patil, U. (2012). A survey on polypharmacy and use of inappropriate medications. Toxicology International. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6580.94506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.