Cited by 4Social Media in Health EducationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Technology in Learning

Pharmacy students' use of social media sites and perception toward Facebook use

Open access
Alkhateeb, FadiM., Alameddine, Sarah, Attarabeen, Omar, Latif, DavidA., Osolin, Shawn, Khanfar, Nile, Al-Rousan, Rabaa·2015·Archives of Pharmacy Practice

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate pharmacy students' adoption and behavior related to social networking sites (SNS) in general, and to Facebook in particular. In addition, this study aimed to explore faculty's adoption of Facebook from students' perspectives, as well as students' willingness, to "friend" their faculty. Materials and Methods: A 19-item questionnaire was administered to a sample of pharmacy students (n = 195) at a School of Pharmacy. The survey included three sections. All questions were closed-ended. The first section had general adoption questions for different SNS. The second section had questions with regard to students' behaviors and attitudes related to Facebook in particular. Demographic data was collected in the third section. Results: One hundred ninety-three pharmacy students completed the survey for a response rate of 99%. The top three social media websites with the most frequent usage were Facebook, Wikipedia, and YouTube respectively. Nearly, all the students (93.8%) had existing Facebook profiles. More than 70% of students had 200 or more Facebook friends at the time of data collection. Given the widespread adoption of Facebook, the majority of the respondents used it for social rather than professional or educational purposes. Even though 46.6% of participants thought that at least 40% of their faculty members use Facebook, slightly more than half of the participants (54.4%) refused the idea of "friending" their faculty. After conducting logistic regression, the predictors of "friending faculty" on Facebook among pharmacy students were the number of Facebook friends that a student has and race or ethnicity. Conclusions: There has been a huge growth in the number and the use of SNS. Students, if they choose to, can take advantage of this revolutionary communication tool to advance professionally. However, the majority of students still choose to use Facebook for social purposes rather than professional or educational purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/2045-080x.165134

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alkhateeb, F., Alameddine, S., Attarabeen, O., Latif, D., Osolin, S., Khanfar, N., & Al-Rousan, R.
Venue
Archives of Pharmacy Practice
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2015
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
77
ISSN
2045-080X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2471580364
Cited by
4
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Archives of Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
pharmacy students, social media use, Facebook, social networking sites, student-faculty relationships, Facebook friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review