Missing data in clinical trials: Pitfalls and remedies
Open accessAbstract
Clinical trials are a robust method to generate data to prove or disprove the hypothesis. One important issue after the enrolment of study subjects in a clinical trial is attrition and missing data due to any number of reasons. The missing data can be due to many factors like duration of trial (longer the trial, more risk of missing data), difficult to assess the outcome, type of intervention (surgical or medical), less adherence to study protocol (e.g. in psychiatric disorders), poor communication with study subjects (to explain about the study, procedures to be followed, follow-up schedule, poor response to patient queries), poor interpersonal relation with the study subject, etc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Missing data were handled by considering the overall mean of the scale or subscale.
“In case of missing data, we considered the overall mean of the scale or the subscale (Kaushal, 2014).”
From Feasibility, Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Autistic Adults without Intellectual Disability: A Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as Kaushal, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2393 · Cited by 7,299 · see citing works
Missing Data in Clinical Studies: Issues and Methods
Ibrahim, J. G., Chu, H., & Chen, M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.38.7589 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bemmouna, D., Coutelle, R., Weibel, S., & Weiner, L. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05317-w · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“In case of missing data, we considered the overall mean of the scale or the subscale (Kaushal, 2014).”
MethodReproducible analysis of disease space via principal components using the novel R package syndRomics
Espin, A. T., Chou, A., Huie, J. R., Kyritsis, N., Upadhyayula, P. S., & Ferguson, A. R. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61812 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flowers, D. W., Brewer, W., Mitchell, K., Ellison, J. B., & Frilot, C. F., II (2022) · Pathophysiology · doi:10.3390/pathophysiology29030040 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Dutta, A., Breloff, S. P., Dai, F., Sinsel, E. W., Warren, C. M., Carey, R. E., & Wu, J. Z. (2021) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002106 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flowers, D. W., Brewer, W., Ellison, J. B., Mitchell, K., & Frilot, C. F., II (2020) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105270 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Feature selection using metaheuristics to predict annual amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression
Anani, T., Pradat‐Peyre, J., Delbot, F., Desnuelle, C., Rolland, A., Devos, D., Pulse Study Group, & Pradat, P. (2025) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.1080/21678421.2025.2522399 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ratnani, P., Dovey, Z., Parekh, S. V., Sobótka, S., Shukla, D. C., Davis, A., Roshandel, R., Wagaskar, V. G., Jambor, I., Lundon, D., et al. (2022) · The Prostate · doi:10.1002/pros.24344 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Wilkerson, W. L. (2016) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · doi:10.13023/etd.2016.020 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Distribution, Pre-analysis of Missing Values and Data Quality
Templ, M. (2023) · Statisctics and computing/Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30073-8_2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Imputation Methods Approach to Clinical and Life Science Research Data Sets
Basavarajaiah, D. M., & Murthy, B. N. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8210-3_11
Ashour, A. S., & Ali, A. S. (2021) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2021.03.006
Dealing with missing data in randomized and cluster randomized trials
Kayembe, M. T. (2021) · doi:10.26481/dis.20211216mk
Enhancing Machine Learning Performance for ALS Classification Using Feature Selection Technique
Dutt, A., Tiwari, A., Tripathi, S., Tiwari, P. K., Kumar, M., Dwivedi, A., Singh, K., Khare, A., Shukla, N. K., & Kumar, N. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16213573
- Authors
- Kaushal, S.
- Affiliations
- Dayanand Medical College & Hospital (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kaushal, Sandeep
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 6
- ISSN
- 2229-516X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4181137
- OpenAlex
- W1672161521
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- missing data, clinical trials, attrition, dropout, protocol adherence, patient communication, trial duration, outcome measurement, missing data imputation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review