Cited by 31Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Efficacy of Bacopa Monnieri (Brahmi) and Donepezil in Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Phase 2b Study

Open access
Modi, Manish, Prabhakar, Sudesh, Vishnu, VenugopalanY, Mohanty, Manju, Sharma, Anchal, Medhi, Bikas, Mittal, BR, Khandelwal, Niranjan +5 more·2020·Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology

Abstract

Objectives: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia worldwide in the older population. There is no disease-modifying therapy available for AD. The current standard of care drug therapy for AD is cholinesterase inhibitors, including donepezil. Bacopa monnieri or brahmi is used in traditional Indian medicine for memory loss. We conducted a phase 2b randomized controlled trial (RCT) to find out the efficacy of brahmi and donepezil in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Patients and Methods: The study was planned as a 52 week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase-2 single-center clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Bacopa monnieri (brahmi) 300 mg OD and donepezil 10 mg OD for 12 months in 48 patients with AD and MCI-AD including cognitive and quality of life outcomes. The primary outcome was differences in the change from baseline of the neuropsychological tests [Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and postgraduate institute (PGI) memory scale] at 12 months between the intervention group (brahmi) and active comparison group (donepezil). Results: The study was terminated after 3 years and 9 months, after recruiting 34 patients, because of slow recruitment and a high dropout rate. Intention to treat analysis after adjusting for baseline confounders showed no difference in the rate of change in ADAS-Cog score from baseline at any time point, including the last follow-up. There was no difference in the rate of change in PGI Memory scale (PGIMS) at 3, 6, and 9 months. In the last follow-up, there was a significant difference in the change in total PGIMS score between brahmi and donepezil, while there was no difference in individual scores of the PGI memory scale. Conclusion: This phase-2 RCT on the efficacy of brahmi vs. donepezil showed no significant difference between them after 1 year of treatment. Larger phase-3 trials, preferably multicentric, are required to find the superiority of brahmi over donepezil.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a randomized, double-blind, single-center phase 2b trial, Bacopa monnieri (brahmi) 300 mg OD was not superior to donepezil 10 mg OD over 12 months in patients with Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment-AD. The trial was terminated early after enrolling 34 of a planned 48 patients because of slow recruitment and high dropout.

Key findings

  • Intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in rate of change in ADAS-Cog score from baseline at any time point, including last follow-up (12-month mean difference corrected 1.76, P = 0.39).
  • There was no difference in rate of change in PGI Memory Scale at 3, 6, and 9 months; at last follow-up, total PGIMS change differed significantly between groups (mean difference corrected −8.40, P = 0.04), with donepezil showing lesser progression, but no individual PGI Memory Scale subscale differed.
  • Secondary outcomes showed no difference except MMSE at 3 months, which improved in the donepezil arm (mean difference corrected 2.74, P = 0.02).
  • Treatment completion was 46.1% in the brahmi arm versus 76.1% in the donepezil arm; adverse events did not differ significantly, and there were three cardiovascular mortalities (two donepezil, one brahmi).

Methods

  • Planned as a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase-2 single-center trial comparing brahmi 300 mg OD with donepezil 10 mg OD in 48 patients with AD or MCI-AD; 65 patients were screened and 34 were randomized (17 per arm).
  • Eligible patients were aged >50 years with MCI-AD or AD by Dubois criteria, modified Hachinski ischemic scale <5, MMSE >10, an available informant, and adequate vision/hearing; diagnosis was supported by MRI, FDG-PET, and CSF Aβ amyloid and total tau.
  • Primary outcome was change from baseline in ADAS-Cog and PGI Memory Scale at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; ITT analysis used multiple imputations for missing data and adjusted for baseline age, sex, baseline neuropsychological test score, and disease duration.

Limitations

  • The paper states the sample size was small for strong conclusions, baseline characteristics differed significantly between arms despite adjustment, and P values for baseline characteristics were not reported because they would not be meaningful with small numbers.
  • The paper states dropout was high and recruitment poor, so the trial was stopped before reaching the planned sample size; it also notes practical difficulties in India, including patients living alone, poor socioeconomic status, and caregivers unable to bring patients for follow-up.
  • The paper states 1 year of drug intake was longer than many brahmi trials but that a 3-year follow-up is ideally needed to document progression, especially in MCI; evident from the text, the study was single-center, registered retrospectively, had no planned blinding evaluation, and had differential treatment completion between arms.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/aian.aian_610_19

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    There was no significant difference in the number of participants with one or more adverse events between groups.

    “There was no significant difference in the number of participants with one or more adverse events [Table 4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There were three mortalities (two in donepezil and one in brahmi) due to cardiovascular causes (myocardial infarction).

    “There were three mortalities (two in donepezil and one in brahmi) due to cardiovascular causes (myocardial infarction).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea, diarrhea, asthenia, arthralgia, headache, dizziness, anxiety, restlessness, insomnia, and crying.

    “The treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, asthenia, arthralgia, headache, dizziness, anxiety, restlessness, insomnia, and crying [Table 4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There was no difference in the rate of change in PGI Memory scale (PGIMS) at 3, 6, and 9 months.

    “There was no difference in the rate of change in PGI Memory scale (PGIMS) at 3, 6, and 9 months.”
    • Also stated in: § Efficacy analysis · plain
      “There was no difference in rate of change in PGIMS at 3, 6, and 9 months [Table 2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    MMSE at 3 months showed improvement in the donepezil arm.

    “The analysis of the secondary outcomes (CDR, MMSE, ADCS-ADL, QOL, animal naming test, and controlled oral word association test ) also showed no difference in ITT analysis except MMSE at 3 months which showed improvement in donepezil arm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At the last follow-up, there was a significant difference in the change in total PGIMS score between brahmi and donepezil, with the donepezil arm showing lesser progression.

    “In the last follow-up, there was a significant difference in the change in total PGIMS score between brahmi and donepezil, while there was no difference in individual scores of the PGI memory scale.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “At the last follow-up, on the PGI memory scale (total score), donepezil arm had lesser progression compared to brahmi, while there was no difference in individual scores of PGI memory scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The current standard of care drug therapy for Alzheimer's disease is cholinesterase inhibitors, including donepezil.

    “The current standard of care drug therapy for AD is cholinesterase inhibitors, including donepezil.[1]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Birks JS Harvey RJ Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018 6 CD001190 29923184 PMC6513124

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The institute ethics committee approved the protocol and consent forms, and informed consent was taken from all participants.

    “Institute ethics committee (Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, reference number PGI/IEC/2012/1171) approved the protocol of the trial and consent forms. Informed consent was taken from all the participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Multiple imputations were used to handle missing data because of loss to follow-up.

    “Multiple imputations were used to handle missing data because of lost to follow up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Baseline imbalances in prognostic variables were adjusted by analysis of covariance.

    “These baseline imbalances in prognostic variables were adjusted by analysis of covariance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was terminated after 3 years and 9 months, after recruiting 34 patients, because of slow recruitment and a high dropout rate.

    “The study was terminated after 3 years and 9 months, after recruiting 34 patients, because of slow recruitment and a high dropout rate.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “The study was terminated after 3 years and 9 months, in view of slow recruitment and high dropout rate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Brahmi reversed L-NNA-induced anterograde and retrograde amnesia.

    “Further research from our group found that brahmi reversed the L-NNA (N (w)-nitro-L-arginine)-induced anterograde and retrograde amnesia.[59]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Subjects, treating neurologists, outcome assessors, and data analysts were blinded to the allocation sequence.

    “The subjects, treating neurologists, outcome assessors, and data analysts were blinded to the allocation sequence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    There were significant differences in baseline characteristics, though they were adjusted in the final analysis.

    “As expected in an RCT with small sample size, there were significant differences in the baseline characteristics though they were adjusted in the final analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Even though there was a statistical difference in the total PGI memory scale, there was no difference in the individual scale subsets and hence there was little clinical significance.

    “Even though there was statistical difference in the total PGI memory scale, there was no difference in the individual scale subsets and, hence, there was little clinical significance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Although the primary outcome time point was at 12 months, many patients did not come for the last evaluation on time and there was a gap between end of study drug intake and final evaluation.

    “Although the primary outcome time point was at 12 months, many patients did not come for the last evaluation on time and there was a gap between end of study drug intake and final evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    There were more patients with AD in the donepezil group and more patients with MCI in the brahmi group.

    “There were more patients with AD in donepezil group and more patients with MCI in brahmi group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study demonstrates the practical problems of conducting an RCT on dementia in a country like India.

    “The study demonstrates the practical problems of conducting an RCT on dementia in a country like India.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Due to four different time points leading to eight primary outcomes, the time point of 12 months or last follow-up was kept as the time point for the primary outcome.

    “Due to four different time points, effectively this led to eight primary outcomes. Hence, we had decided to keep the time point of 12 months or last follow-up as the time point for primary outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of good clinical practice.

    “The trial was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and the principles of good clinical practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No blindness evaluation was planned in the study.

    “No blindness evaluation was planned in the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The dropout rate was high and recruitment rate was poor, and hence the trial had to be stopped prior to attaining the sample size.

    “The dropout rate was high and recruitment rate was poor and, hence, trial had to be stopped prior to attaining the sample size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our study is the first randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of brahmi in MCI-AD and AD, proven by CSF biomarkers (Abeta42 amyloid and T-Tau) and FDG-PET imaging.

    “Our study is the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy of brahmi in MCI-AD and AD, proven by CSF biomarkers (Abeta42 amyloid and T-Tau) and FDG-PET imaging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    An independent data and safety monitoring board monitored all adverse events.

    “An independent data and safety monitoring board monitored all the adverse events.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the cognitive effects of brahmi concluded that Bacopa monnieri has potential to improve cognition, particularly speed of attention, but only a large well-designed head-to-head trial against an existing medication will provide definitive data on its efficacy.

    “A meta-analysis of randomized control trials on the cognitive effects of brahmi concluded that “Bacopa monnieri has potential to improve cognition, particularly speed of attention but only a large well designed 'head-to-head' trial against an existing medication will provide definitive data on its efficacy on healthy or dementia patients using a standardized preparation.”[10]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Kongkeaw C Dilokthornsakul P Thanarangsarit P Limpeanchob N Norman Scholfield C Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on cognitive effects of Bacopa monnieri extract J Ethnopharmacol 2014 151 528 35 24252493

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Donepezil is widely used in clinical practice for MCI-AD because it is challenging to differentiate mild AD from MCI-AD without detailed neuropsychological evaluation including assessment of activities of daily living.

    “But donepezil is widely used in clinical practice for MCI-AD since in routine clinical practice, it is challenging to differentiate mild AD from MCI-AD without a detailed neuropsychological evaluation including assessment of activities of daily living.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The median duration of disease was more in the brahmi group.

    “The median duration of disease was more in brahmi group and more severe scores of baseline neuropsychological scales in donepezil group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The trial was registered retrospectively because of communication issues, but patients were recruited only after approval from the ethics committee.

    “The trial was registered retrospectively because of communication issues, but the patients were recruited only after approval from the ethics committee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Diagnosis of AD/MCI-AD was confirmed using MRI brain, FDG PET brain, and cerebrospinal fluid Ab amyloid and total tau.

    “Diagnosis of AD/MCI-AD was confirmed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG PET) brain, and cerebrospinal fluid “(CSF) Ab amyloid and total tau.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The randomization sequence was generated by independent personnel from the department of pharmacology who were not involved in the study.

    “The randomization sequence was generated by independent personnel from department of pharmacology who were not involved in the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Though we cannot claim noninferiority between brahmi and donepezil based on the results, it gives enough data for a larger phase-3 trial to detect superiority of brahmi over donepezil.

    “Though we cannot claim noninferiority between brahmi and donepezil based on the results, it gives enough data for a larger phase-3 trial to detect superiority of brahmi over donepezil.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    MCI-AD or amnestic MCI is 15 times more likely to develop AD on follow-up.

    “Moreover, MCI-AD or amnestic MCI is 15 times more likely to develop AD on follow-up.[3]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Burns A Iliffe S Dementia BMJ 2009 338 b75 19196746

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Only 46.1% in the brahmi arm completed the course of treatment, while 76.1% completed the treatment in the donepezil arm.

    “Only 46.1% in brahmi arm completed the course of treatment, while 76.1% completed the treatment in donepezil arm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted and all patients randomized were included in the final analysis.

    “Intention to treat (ITT) analysis was conducted and all patients randomized were included in the final analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Outcomes were adjusted for baseline age, sex, baseline neuropsychological test score, and duration of disease.

    “The outcomes were adjusted for baseline age, sex, baseline neuropsychological test score, and duration of disease.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Postulated therapeutic effects of bacosides include enhancement of nerve impulse transmission, restoration of synaptic activity, and repair of damaged neurons by upregulating neuronal synthesis and kinase activity and maintaining neurotransmitter balance.

    “The postulated therapeutic effects of bacosides include enhancement of nerve impulse transmission, restoration of synaptic activity, and repair of damaged neurons by upregulating neuronal synthesis and kinase activity and maintaining neurotransmitter balance.[46]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bacopa monnieri or brahmi is used in traditional Indian medicine for memory loss, and Ayurveda literature reports its medicinal properties for the treatment of anxiety, intellect, and memory disorders.

    “Indian traditional medicine (Ayurveda) literature reports its medicinal properties for the treatment of anxiety, intellect, and memory disorders.[4]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Singh HK Dhawan BN Neuropsychopharmacological effects of the Ayurvedic nootropic Bacopa monnieri Linn.(Brahmi) Indian J Pharmacol 1997 29 359

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Major active constituents in brahmi with possible action on memory and cognition are bacoside-A and bacoside-B.

    “Major active constituents in brahmi with possible action on memory and cognition are bacoside-A and bacoside-B apart from other phytochemicals like alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, etc.[5]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Mathur D Goyal K Koul V Anand A The molecular links of re-emerging therapy: A review of evidence of Brahmi (Bacopa monniera) Front Pharmacol 2016 7 44 26973531 PMC4778428

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both these studies may have included MCI and some normal healthy subjects also.

    “Hence, both these studies may have included MCI and some normal healthy subjects also.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample size of 48 participants (24 each) was calculated for a phase-2 trial using Simon's randomized phase-2 design with a least expected baseline response rate of 12% and an assumed difference in response rate of 20%.

    “The sample size of 48 participants (24 each) was calculated for phase-2 trial (using Simon's randomized phase-2 design) for intervention and active comparison groups with least expected baseline response rate of 12% and assumed difference in response rate between the best treatment and the other treatments as 20%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Peer-reviewed published data on the use of brahmi in AD and MCI-AD is limited.

    “Even though there is good quality preclinical evidence on the utility of brahmi, peer-reviewed published data on the use of the brahmi in AD and MCI-AD is limited.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of high-quality evidence in the form of randomized controlled trials comparing brahmi and donepezil in the management of AD/MCI-AD.

    “There is a lack of high-quality evidence in the form of randomized control trials comparing brahmi and donepezil (common drug used in standard of care) in the management of AD/MCI-AD.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A couple of memory-related processes could potentially be modulated by Bacopa monnieri in isolation or in combination with other compounds.

    “Although memory is greatly affected by a plethora of factors, such as hormones, cyclic AMP, neurotransmitters, focus, attention, synapse formation, nutrients, and protein transcription, a couple of these processes could potentially be modulated by B. monnieri in isolation or in combination with other compounds as partially shown in these studies [56,57,101,110,111].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Overall conclusion denies a reported significant primary-outcome difference

    Major

    The conclusion says there was no significant difference after one year, but the results explicitly report a significant difference in the total PGI memory scale at the last follow-up. The paper identifies this scale as a primary outcome.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modi, M., Prabhakar, S., Vishnu, V., Mohanty, M., Sharma, A., Medhi, B., Mittal, B., Khandelwal, N., Goyal, M., Lal, V., Singla, R., Kansal, A., & Avasthi, A.
Affiliations
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Modi, Manish
Venue
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Published
2020
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
767
ISSN
0972-2327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114554598
Cited by
31
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Bacopa monnieri, donepezil, Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, cholinesterase inhibitors, traditional medicine, cognitive function, memory, ADAS-Cog, trial termination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review