The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodology series module 9: Designing questionnaires and clinical record forms – Part II
Open accessAbstract
This article is a continuation of the previous module on designing questionnaires and clinical record form in which we have discussed some basic points about designing the questionnaire and clinical record forms. In this section, we will discuss the reliability and validity of questionnaires. The different types of validity are face validity, content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity. The different types of reliability are test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and intra-rater reliability. Some of these parameters are assessed by subject area experts. However, statistical tests should be used for evaluation of other parameters. Once the questionnaire has been designed, the researcher should pilot test the questionnaire. The items in the questionnaire should be changed based on the feedback from the pilot study participants and the researcher's experience. After the basic structure of the questionnaire has been finalized, the researcher should assess the validity and reliability of the questionnaire or the scale. If an existing standard questionnaire is translated in the local language, the researcher should assess the reliability and validity of the translated questionnaire, and these values should be presented in the manuscript. The decision to use a self- or interviewer-administered, paper- or computer-based questionnaire depends on the nature of the questions, literacy levels of the target population, and resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“we did not conduct formal survey validation, such as criterion and construct validation.”
From Effect of an Electronic Health Record-Based Intervention on Documentation Practices (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 7,011
Sarkar, R., Garg, S., Dominguez, A. R., Balkrishnan, R., Jain, R., & Pandya, A. (2015) · Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology and Leprology · doi:10.4103/0378-6323.168937 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“The steps in translations were (1) translation; (2) review by the expert committee; (3) back translation; (4) rereview by the committee; (5) pretesting; and (6) final revision.”
Scoring of Hand Eczema: Good Reliability of Hand Eczema Extent Score (HEES)
Carlsson, A., Svensson, L., Anderson, C., Baranovskaya, I., Hindsén-Stenström, M., Holt, I., Meding, B., Stenberg, B., Stenlund, H. C., & Gĺnemo, A. (2016) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-2521 · Cited by 18
Cazzaniga, S., Lecchi, S., Bruze, M., Chosidow, O., Diepgen, T. L., Gonçalo, M., Hercogova, J. T., Pigatto, P. D. M., & Naldi, L. (2014) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.12879 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“The steps in translations were (1) translation; (2) review by the expert committee; (3) back translation; (4) rereview by the committee; (5) pretesting; and (6) final revision.”
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [6]Streiner DL Norman GR Health Measurement Scales – a practical guide to their development and use 2003 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Questionnaires for evaluating virtual reality: A systematic scoping review
Bareišytė, L., Slatman, S., Austin, J., Rosema, M., van Sintemaartensdijk, I., Watson, S. J., & Bode, C. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100505 · Cited by 66
E-Professionalism as a Professional Identity in the Digital Era of Medical Education
Lonappan, J., Aithal, P. S., & Jacob, M. (2023) · International Journal of Health Sciences and Pharmacy · doi:10.47992/ijhsp.2581.6411.0107 · Cited by 45
Knowledge, attitude and practice of community pharmacists towards nutrition counseling
Medhat, M. I. M., Sabry, N. A., & Ashoush, N. (2020) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-020-01106-0 · Cited by 30
Viskić, J., Jokić, D., Marelić, M., Machala Poplašen, L., Relić, D., Sedak, K., & Vukušić Rukavina, T. (2021) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2021.62.569 · Cited by 24
“…was internally reviewed for content validity by a multi-disciplinary expert team in the field (psychiatrist, sociologist, communicologist, doctor of medicine, and doctor of dental medicine) (21,22) to theoretically assess whether these domains adequately measured our research objectives (23,24).”
E-Professionalism as a Professional Identity in the Digital Era of Medical Education
Lonappan, J., Aithal, P. S., & Jacob, M. (2023) · International Journal of Health Sciences and Pharmacy · doi:10.47992/10.5281/zenodo.8329407 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Setia, M.
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Dermatology
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258
- ISSN
- 0019-5154 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5448259
- OpenAlex
- W2612858184
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- questionnaire design, questionnaire validity, questionnaire reliability, face validity, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, pilot testing, translated questionnaires, self-administered questionnaire, interviewer-administered questionnaire
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methodology series module 9: Designing questionnaires and clinical record forms – Part II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/ijd.ijd_200_17
- The paper
- Setia, M. (2017). Methodology series module 9: Designing questionnaires and clinical record forms – Part II. Indian Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_200_17
