Cited by 40Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The ethics of machine learning in medical sciences: Where do we stand today?

Open access
Basu, Treena, Menzer, Olaf, Engel-Wolf, Sebastian·2020·Indian Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Advances in Machine Learning and availability of state-of-the-art computational resources, along with digitized healthcare data, have set the stage for extensive application of artificial intelligence in the realm of diagnosis, prognosis, clinical decision support, personalized treatment options, drug development, and the field of biomedicine. Here, we discuss the application of Machine Learning algorithms in patient healthcare and dermatological domains along with the ethical complexities that are involved. In scientific studies, ethical challenges were initially not addressed proportionally (as assessed by keyword counts in PubMed) and just more recently (since 2016) this has started to improve. Few pioneering countries have created regulatory guidelines around how to respect matters of (1) privacy, (2) fairness, (3) accountability, (4) transparency and (5) conflict of interest when developing novel medical Machine Learning applications. While there is a strong promise of emerging medical applications to ultimately benefit both the patients and the medical practitioners, it is important to raise awareness on the five key ethical issues and incorporate them into medical practice in the near future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijd.ijd_419_20

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical considerations are another challenge because AI-based approaches may raise concerns about fairness and bias.

    “Another challenge is presented by ethical considerations [42] since AI-based approaches may raise concerns about fairness and bias (see next section) [43].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Hall P Gill N Introduction to Machine Learning Interpretability O'Reilly Media, Incorporated 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basu, T., Menzer, O., & Engel-Wolf, S.
Affiliations
  • Occidental College (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Basu, Treena
  • Menzer, Olaf
Venue
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Published
2020
Volume
65
Issue
5
Pages
358
ISSN
0019-5154 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048449535
Cited by
39
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
machine learning ethics, artificial intelligence in healthcare, dermatology, clinical decision support, privacy, algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency, conflicts of interest, regulatory guidelines, health data, personalized treatment, drug development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review