The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: A case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
Background & objectives: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at an elevated risk of contracting COVID-19. While intense occupational exposure associated with aerosol-generating procedures underlines the necessity of using personal protective equipment (PPE) by HCWs, high-transmission efficiency of the causative agent [severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)] could also lead to infections beyond such settings. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a repurposed antimalarial drug, was empirically recommended as prophylaxis by the National COVID-19 Task Force in India to cover such added risk. Against this background, the current investigation was carried out to identify the factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs in the country. Methods: A case-control design was adopted and participants were randomly drawn from the countrywide COVID-19 testing data portal maintained by the ICMR. The test results and contact details of HCWs, diagnosed as positive (cases) or negative (controls) for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), were available from this database. A 20-item brief-questionnaire elicited information on place of work, procedures conducted and use of PPE. Results: Compared to controls, cases were slightly older (34.7 vs. 33.5 yr) and had more males (58 vs. 50%). In multivariate analyses, HCWs performing endotracheal intubation had higher odds of being SARS-CoV-2 infected [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 4.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-16.07]. Consumption of four or more maintenance doses of HCQ was associated with a significant decline in the odds of getting infected (AOR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.88); a dose-response relationship existed between frequency of exposure to HCQ and such reductions (χ 2 for trend=48.88; P<0.001). In addition, the use of PPE was independently associated with the reduction in odds of getting infected with SARS-CoV-2. Interpretations & conclusions: Until results of clinical trials for HCQ prophylaxis become available, this study provides actionable information for policymakers to protect HCWs at the forefront of COVID-19 response. The public health message of sustained intake of HCQ prophylaxis as well as appropriate PPE use need to be considered in conjunction with risk homoeostasis operating at individual levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Ren, R., Leung, K. S. M., Lau, E. H. Y., Wong, J. Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001316 · Cited by 16,575
Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Prather, K. A., Wang, C. C., & Schooley, R. T. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc6197 · Cited by 850
Condoms and seat belts: the parallels and the lessons
Richens, J., Imrie, J., & Copas, A. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)09109-6 · Cited by 144
Verbeek, J. H., Ijaz, S., Mischke, C., Ruotsalainen, J. H., Mäkelä, E., Neuvonen, K., Edmond, M. B., Sauni, R., Kilinc Balci, F. S., & Mihalache, R. C. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011621.pub2 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Gómez-Ochoa, S. A., Franco, O. H., Rojas, L. Z., Raguindin, P. F., Roa-Díaz, Z. M., Wyssmann, B. M., Guevara, S. L. R., Echeverría, L. E., Glisic, M., & Muka, T. (2021) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa191 · Cited by 785
Zhou, G., Verweij, S., Bijlsma, M. J., de Vos, S., Oude Rengerink, K., Pasmooij, A. M. G., van Baarle, D., Niesters, H. G. M., Mol, P., Vonk, J. M., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open Respiratory Research · doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001674 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterjee, P., Anand, T., Singh, K. J., Rasaily, R., Singh, R., Das, S., Singh, H., Praharaj, I., Gangakhedkar, R. R., Bhargava, B., & Panda, S.
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Medical Research
- Publisher
- Scientific Scholar
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 459-467
- ISSN
- 0971-5916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3030748363
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: A case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2234_20
- The paper
- Chatterjee, P., Anand, T., Singh, K. J., Rasaily, R., Singh, R., Das, S., Singh, H., Praharaj, I., Gangakhedkar, R. R., Bhargava, B., & Panda, S. (2020). Healthcare workers & SARS-CoV-2 infection in India: A case-control investigation in the time of COVID-19. Indian Journal of Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2234_20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.