Cited by 27Dental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Health and Care Utilization

Evaluation of Success of Stainless Steel Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique in Children with High Caries Risk: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Kaptan, A, Korkmaz, E·2021·Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and survival rates of the hall technique (HT), and conventional restoration (CR) for the management of occlusoproximal carious lesions in primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This clinical study observed 35 children (aged 4-8 years). Exclusion criteria included symptoms of pulpal or periradicular pathology or systemic conditions requiring special dental considerations. For each child, at least one tooth was treated with HT and one with CR. The primary outcome measures were minor and major clinical failure rates. Plaque and gingival scores of the teeth were also evaluated. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed ranks test were used to compare the plaque and gingival index scores for each arm. Chi-square tests were used for comparisons of clinical outcomes, plaque-gingival index, and distribution of ICDAS categories among treatment arms (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Thirty-three of 35 (94.2%) participants returned for 1-year follow-up. HT showed statistically significantly higher treatment survival rate and fewer minor failures than CR (P = 0.040). The rate of major failures was minimal (2 of 84 teeth) and did not differ between treatments (P = 0.092). In both treatment groups, the gingival score and plaque score were significantly decreased at the 1-year follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: HT was a more successful method for managing caries in primary molars than CR, both for symptoms of pulpal disease and longevity of the restorations. HT is a simplified method of managing carious primary molars using SSCs cemented with no local anesthesia, caries removal, or tooth preparation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/njcp.njcp_112_20

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When compared to conventional restorations, specifically with GIC restorations, Hall technique was shown to have significantly lower minor failure rates.

    “When compared to conventional restorations, specifically with GIC restorations, HT was shown to have significantly lower minor failure rates [22], [23].”
  • Gingival index was found to be significantly better in both Hall technique and control groups after treatment in one study.

    “However, GI was found to be significantly better in both HT and control groups after treatment in one study [22]”
  • With regards to major failures, Hall technique was found to have similar rates when compared to conventional restorations.

    “With regards to major failures, HT was found to have similar rates when compared to conventional restorations [22], [23].”
  • Gingival index was not found to be different between Hall technique and control groups in three studies.

    “Gingival index (GI) was not found to be different in three studies between HT and control groups [20], [22], [24].”
  • For studies not included in the meta-analysis, Hall technique had a success rate ranging from 85% to 93%.

    “For the studies not included in the meta-analysis, [22], [23], [24] HT had a success rate ranging from 85 % to 93 %.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaptan, A., & Korkmaz, E.
Affiliations
Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Kaptan, A
Venue
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2021-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
425-434
ISSN
1119-3077 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136966405
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
Hall technique, stainless steel crowns, primary molars, high caries risk, pediatric dentistry, restoration longevity, caries management, minimally invasive dentistry
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Crowns, Dental Caries, Dental Caries Susceptibility, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Humans, Molar, Stainless Steel, Tooth, Deciduous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review