Cited by 3Central Venous Catheters and HemodialysisInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

Clinical competence with central venous lines by resident doctors in a Nigerian teaching hospital

Edaigbini, SundayA, Aminu, MuhammadB, Delia, IbrahimZ, Ibrahim, Abdulrasheed, Okwunodulo, Okwuoma, Alegbejo-Olarinoye, Mojirola·2017·Sub-Saharan African Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Central venous catheterization has become not only common but a very useful clinical procedure in all well-established tertiary hospitals world over. This study aims to assess the competence of resident doctors with central venous lines in a tertiary institution in the subregion. Materials and Methods: A structured proforma was used to assess the information from resident doctors in four departments of the training institution. The result was analyzed with SPSS version 15.0 software program (SPSS 2006, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: A total of 40 residents were assessed, 30 (75%) males and 10 (25%) females with a mean age of 35.08 ± 4.999 years. Twelve (30%) and 28 (70%) had spent <2 years and >2 years in residency, respectively. Nineteen (47.5%) ticked that a line in the subclavian vein is a central line while 1 (2.5%) ticked same for femoral vein. Fifteen (37.5%) ticked correctly types of central line. Nineteen (47.5%) had observed the procedure in their institution and 7 (17.5%) elsewhere. Eleven (27.5%) knew that any experienced doctor could insert a central. Only 1 (2.5%) resident had inserted a central line. Ten (25%) knew that central line is inserted by ‘’SELDINGER’S’’ technique. Fourteen (35%), 4 (10%), and 20 (50%) said central line can be inserted only in the theatre, by the bedside, and both respectively. Thirty (75%) ticked correctly the uses of central line. Only 3 (7.5%) knew correctly a combination of central line complications. Twenty-five (62.5%) knew that chest X-ray is required after central line insertion. Conclusion: Based on knowledge assessment, the resident doctors in this institution are clinically incompetent in central venous line and efforts must be made to reverse the situation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ssajm.ssajm_37_16

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edaigbini, S., Aminu, M., Delia, I., Ibrahim, A., Okwunodulo, O., & Alegbejo-Olarinoye, M.
Affiliations
Ahmadu Bello University (NG)
Corresponding author
Edaigbini, SundayA
Venue
Sub-Saharan African Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2017
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
47
ISSN
2384-5147 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794861765
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sub-Saharan African Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
central venous catheterization, central venous catheters, medical residents, clinical competence, medical education, subclavian vein, femoral vein, Seldinger technique, central line complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review