Cited by 43Technology Use by Older AdultsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Using participatory design to determine the needs of informal caregivers for smart home user interfaces

Open access
Hwang, Amy, Truong, Khai, Mihailidis, Alex·2012·Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

Abstract

Smart home technologies hold potential to help older adults with dementia complete activities independently, while alleviating the burden placed on their informal caregivers. Toward this goal, more research focus is needed to involve informal caregivers in the needs analysis and design of smart home

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248671

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults may no longer be independent in performing activities of daily living and rely on family or caregivers for support, whose needs, constraints, and preferences must also be considered in the design process.

    “Older adults may no longer be independent in performing activities of daily living (ADL) and rely on people ( e.g. , family, caregivers) for support, whose needs, constraints, and preferences must also be considered in the design process [19].”

    From Situated Participatory Design: A Method for In Situ Design of Robotic Interaction with Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction says that older adults with dementia may lose independence in daily activities and require care, often from family or other informal caregivers. The Discussion says caregivers’ needs, preferences, challenges, and requirements matter for smart-home design. The citing sentence omits the paper’s dementia-specific context and applies the point to older adults more generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, A., Truong, K., & Mihailidis, A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Amy
Venue
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012
Pages
41-48
ISSN
2153-1633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009010391
Cited by
43
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • International Conference on Pervasive Computing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
participatory design, informal caregivers, home automation, user interface, dementia, older adults, needs assessment, caregiver burden, independent living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review