Cited by 39Innovative Human-Technology InteractionNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Persuasion not required Improving our understanding of the sociotechnical context of dietary behavioural change

Open access
Maitland, Julie, Chalmers, Matthew, Siek, Katie A.·2009·Proceedings of the 3d International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

Abstract

In view of the well-acknowledged inequalities in health between the rich and the poor, populations of low socioeconomic status stand to benefit most from advances in technology designed to promote health- related behavioural change. In this paper we investigate attitudes towards diet and the perceiv

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth2009.5928

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study showed that E-COmate seems to have positive impacts through awareness as well as engagements toward reducing waste particularly around shopping.

    “Although previous work have pointed out that not providing an explicit solution to the user is a limitation of eco-feedback (Maitland et al., 2009; Brynjarsdottir et al., 2012), our study showed that E-COmate seems to have positive impacts through awareness as well as engagements toward reducing waste particularly around shopping.”

    From Eco-Feedback for Food Waste Reduction in a Student Residence (2021) · cites this paper as Maitland et al., 2009

    The Introduction and Discussion argue that technologies should not stop at raising awareness: they should help users take practical steps toward dietary change. That supports the cited clause’s underlying point, but the paper does not specifically describe the absence of an explicit solution as a limitation of eco-feedback. The sentence’s finding about E-COmate is the citing authors’ own result, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]8. Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D., and Grinter, R.E.EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. In Proc. CSCW, (2008), ACM.
  2. [10]10. McLean, N. Griffin, S., Toney, K., and Hardeman, W. Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions: a systematic review of randomized control trials. Int. 1. of Obesity, 27 (2003), 987-1005
  3. [11]11. Chang, K. Liu, S.-y., Chu, H.-h., Hsu, J.Y.-j., Chen, C., Lin, T.-y., Chen, C.-y., and Huang, P. The Diet-Aware Dining Table: Observing Dietary Behaviours over a Tabletop Surface. In Proc. Pervasive (2006), LNCS.
  4. [23]23. Berkman, L. and Glass, T. Social integration, social support, and health. In Berkman, L. and Kawachi, I. (Eds.) Social Epidemiology, (2000)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maitland, J., Chalmers, M., & Siek, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
  • Maitland, Julie
  • Chalmers, Matthew
  • Siek, Katie A.
Venue
Proceedings of the 3d International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
Publisher
ICST
Published
2009
ISSN
2153-1633 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163361397
Cited by
39
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
dietary behavior change, socio-technical context, low socioeconomic status, health disparities, perceived social norms, persuasive technology, health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review