Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 992

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What CDA Is About – A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments1

Wodak, Ruth·2001·Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the studies in the area of Critical Discourse Analysis (ACD). To begin with, I explain the meaning of the terms CDA and CL (Critical Linguistics), and how a ‘scientific peer group’ was formed, involving the pioneers in CDA. Next, I outline a brief history of CL and CDA as a new area of discourse studies, and move on to define some key terms in the field, such as ‘critical’, ‘ideology’ and ‘power’. Finally, I point out some open questions and perspectives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9780857028020.n1

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Metadata

Authors
Wodak, R.
Venue
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Published
2001
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W193171151
Cited by
992
References
36
FWCI
135.41
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What CDA Is About – A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9780857028020.n1
The paper
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA Is About – A Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Its Developments1. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.