The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Leadership for the Common Good
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The common good can be legitimately envisioned and articulated in different ways, for example, as justice, freedom and security (Sluga, 2014), and appears to be as much about process as outcomes (Wilson, 2023).”
From A search for commonalities in defining the common good: Using folk theories to unlock shared conceptions. (2024) · cites this paper as Wilson, 2023
Citations
Cited by
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Regulation Inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleazebusters
Hood, C., James, O., Jones, G., Scott, C., & Travers, T. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198280998.001.0001 · Cited by 654
Municipal Support for Social Entrepreneurship
Korosec, R. L., & Berman, E. M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00601.x · Cited by 264
Leadership and Institutional Reform: Engineering Macroeconomic Policy Change in Australia
Goldfinch, S. F., & Hart, P. ‘. (2003) · Governance · doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00215 · Cited by 84
Changing Public Organizations: Four Approaches
Rusaw, A. C. (2007) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900690601117853 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, S. G.
- Corresponding author
- Samuel G. Wilson
- Venue
- The SAGE Encyclopedia of Leadership Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2023
- OpenAlex
- W4382243637
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Education, Leadership, and Health Research
- Keywords
- leadership, common good
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
