CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 480Computational and Text Analysis MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsEducational Research and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Content Analysis Guidebook

Neuendorf, Kimberly A.·2017·Sage eBooks
DOI 10.4135/9781071873045
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781071873045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–459 of 459

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Neuendorf, K. A.
Corresponding author
Neuendorf, Kimberly A.
Venue
Sage eBooks
Publisher
SAGE Publications, Inc
Published
2017
DOI
10.4135/9781071873045
OpenAlex
W4411746978
Cited by
480
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 205 · 2025: 195 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6
FWCI
4.27
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Analysis
Keywords
content analysis, qualitative research, text analysis, research design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review