The Heuristic-Systematic Model of Social Information Processing

TODOROV, ALEXANDER, CHAIKEN, SHELLY, HENDERSON, MARLONE D.·2002·The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice

DOI 10.4135/9781412976046.n11

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412976046.n11

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2009) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02428 · Cited by 1,663
Examining the influence of online reviews on consumers’ decision-making: a heuristic–systematic model
Zhang, K. Z. K., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2014) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.08.005 · Cited by 781
The gateway belief model: a large-scale replication
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009 · Cited by 262
Impact of misinformation from generative AI on user information processing: How people understand misinformation from generative AI
Shin, D., Koerber, A., & Lim, J. S. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241234040 · Cited by 137
Investigating tourists' risk information processing
Aliperti, G., & Cruz, A. M. (2019) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102803 · Cited by 92
Implicit and explicit training in the mitigation of cognitive bias through the use of a serious game
Dunbar, N. E., Miller, C. H., Adame, B. J., Elizondo, J., Wilson, S. N., Lane, B. L., Kauffman, A. A., Bessarabova, E., Jensen, M. L., Straub, S. K., et al. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.053 · Cited by 83
The influence of B to B social media message features on brand engagement: A fluency perspective
McShane, L., Pancer, E., & Poole, M. (2019) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/1051712x.2019.1565132 · Cited by 82
Guest editorial: investigating the effect of the physical context on customer experience
Bruce, H. L., Krolikowska, E., & Rooney, T. (2023) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-05-2023-0163 · Cited by 17

Authors: TODOROV, A., CHAIKEN, S., & HENDERSON, M. D.
Venue: The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice
Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Published: 2002
Pages: 195-212
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976046.n11
OpenAlex: W2488917295
Cited by: 311
References: 0
FWCI: 7.13
Type: book chapter
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review