The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Canonical Analysis and Factor Comparison
Open accessAbstract
An advanced study which presumes a knowledge of multiple regression and factor analysis techniques, this paper considers two techniques for comparing entire sets of data, and develops the canonical correlation model as an extension of regression analysis in which there are several dependent variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide
OECD, Union, E., & Joint Research Centre - European Commission (2008) · doi:10.1787/9789264043466-en · Cited by 3,960
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications.
Thompson, B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10694-000 · Cited by 3,469
Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations
Rubin, A. M. (1983) · Journal of Broadcasting · doi:10.1080/08838158309386471 · Cited by 912
Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing
Rubin, A. M. (1984) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02174.x · Cited by 679
Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage
Furnham, A. (1984) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(84)90025-4 · Cited by 527
Diagnosticity and multidimensional subjective workload ratings
TSANG, P. S., & VELAZQUEZ, V. L. (1996) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139608964470 · Cited by 260
O'Connor, K., Bélanger, L., Aardema, F., Pérodeau, G., & Harel, F. (2012) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.3109/14659891.2010.513755 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, M.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 1977
- OpenAlex
- W2076599168
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
