The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Abstract
Book synopsis: `This book constitutes a valuable resource for postgraduate students and researchers. Most.... of the chapters succeed in providing a clear and comprehensive introduction to the various approaches and/or methods, thus enabling the reader to make an informed decision about whether or not they wish to pursue the topic further. The book as a whole is also very well referenced and this makes it a source of essential information for students and researchers with an interest in qualitative health psychology' - Health Psychology Update \n \nThis book explains the role of qualitative research within health psychology. Theories and methods from a qualitative perspective are highly varied but, in general, differ from the positivist approach which is concerned with quantifying the individual risk factors presumed to cause health and illness behaviour. This book shows clearly how a qualitative approach offers a better understanding of the experience of illness while locating it in its broader social context. \n \nProviding a detailed examination of these issues, the book is organized into three sections - the first considers some of the main theoretical perspectives underlying qualitative research in health psychology including discourse analysis and narrative as well as the social context and embodiment of health and illness; the second examines some of the practical issues involved in conducting qualitative research with different populations, such as children and the terminally ill; and the final section considers a range of analytic issues and specific analytic approaches such as grounded theory and action research, and the evaluation of qualitative methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919899220 · Cited by 3,871
“Several practical how-to guides have been published to date (e.g., Attride-Stirling, 2001; Braun & Clarke, 2006; Charmaz, 2006; Joffe, 2012; Roberts et al., 2019; Smith et al., 1999).”
BackgroundSystematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis
Malterud, K. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494812465030 · Cited by 2,305
Brocki, J. M., & Wearden, A. J. (2006) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/14768320500230185 · Cited by 1,433
Interpretative phenomenological analysis
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2004) · Doing Social Psychology Research · doi:10.1002/9780470776278.ch10 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M.
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Psychology: Theories and Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 218-240
- OpenAlex
- W2502071815
- Cited by
- 1,651
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 137.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781446217870.n14
- The paper
- Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Qualitative Health Psychology: Theories and Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217870.n14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.