Cited by 2,305Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsSociology and Education Studies

Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis

Malterud, Kirsti·2012·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aims To present background, principles, and procedures for a strategy for qualitative analysis called systematic text condensation and discuss this approach compared with related strategies. Methods Giorgi's psychological phenomenological analysis is the point of departure and inspiration for systematic text condensation. The basic elements of Giorgi's method and the elaboration of these in systematic text condensation are presented, followed by a detailed description of procedures for analysis according to systematic text condensation. Finally, similarities and differences compared with other frequently applied methods for qualitative analysis are identified, as the foundation of a discussion of strengths and limitations of systematic text condensation. Results Systematic text condensation is a descriptive and explorative method for thematic cross-case analysis of different types of qualitative data, such as interview studies, observational studies, and analysis of written texts. The method represents a pragmatic approach, although inspired by phenomenological ideas, and various theoretical frameworks can be applied. The procedure consists of the following steps: 1) total impression - from chaos to themes; 2) identifying and sorting meaning units - from themes to codes; 3) condensation - from code to meaning; 4) synthesizing - from condensation to descriptions and concepts. Similarities and differences comparing systematic text condensation with other frequently applied qual…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494812465030

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Yamazaki H, 2009, Biosci Trends, 3, 202
  2. Malterud K, 2011, Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning
  3. Giorgi A. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. Phenomenology and psychological research: essays. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. 1985, pp 8–22.
  4. Kohak E, 1978, Idea & experience – Edmund Husserl’s project of phenomenology in IDEAS I
  5. Miller WL, 1999, Doing qualitative reasearch, 20
  6. Glaser BG, 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research
  7. Kuzel A, 1999, Doing qualitative reasearch, 33

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malterud, K.
Affiliations
Uni Research (Norway) (NO)
Corresponding author
Malterud, Kirsti
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2012-12
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
795-805
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2078904464
Cited by
2,305
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 198 · 2024: 273 · 2023: 227 · 2022: 239 · 2021: 261 · 2020: 211 · 2019: 171 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 132 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 26
FWCI
280.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
qualitative data analysis, meaning units, code development, thematic analysis, methodological quality, reflexivity, intersubjectivity
MeSH terms
Humans, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review