Cited by 2,259Critical Realism in SociologyPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationLogic and Philosophy of Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Realism and Social Science

Sayer, Andrew·2000·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781446218730

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 882

Metadata

Authors
Sayer, A.
Corresponding author
Sayer, Andrew
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2000
OpenAlex
W4243252020
Cited by
2,259
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 125 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 80
FWCI
42.93
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
realism, social sciences, epistemology of social science, philosophy of social science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review