Cited by 846Contemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeEnvironmental Education and SustainabilitySustainability and Climate Change Governance

The Dynamics of Social Practice

Elizabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar, Matt Watson·2012·The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes

Abstract

The seminars is organised around a series of propositions about social practices and how they change. The strategy is to explore a sequence of distinct but related claims, for instance, that practices depend on the active integration of recognisable elements including materials, meanings and forms of competence; that practices recruit carriers willing and able to keep them alive, and that practices compete and support each other in different ways. These somewhat abstract ideas are developed and illustrated with reference to a range of practical cases and examples, most relating to issues of daily life and ordinary consumption. One aim is to show how propositions about practice can be linked together to produce a framework for understanding everyday life and how it changes. A second ambition is to articulate the practical implications of such an approach for policy and for deliberate efforts to change what people do, especially with respect to challenges like those of climate change and sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781446250655.n1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practices start to evolve and change meaning when the number of engaged practitioners increases.

    “Practices start to evolve and change meaning when the number of engaged practitioners increases (Shove et al. 2012).”

    From Servitization for a Circular Economy in Construction (2025) · cites this paper as Shove et al. 2012

  • Practices are done by interdependent relations between three elements: materials, competence, and meanings.

    “The model describes how practices are done by interdependent relations between three elements: materials, competence, and meanings (Shove et al. 2012).”

    From Servitization for a Circular Economy in Construction (2025) · cites this paper as Shove et al. 2012

  • An individual who gains a positive experience by performing a certain practice might increase his or her engagement and develop experience further.

    “An individual who gains a positive experience by performing a certain practice might increase his or her engagement and develop experience further (Shove et al. 2012;Warde 2005).”

    From Servitization for a Circular Economy in Construction (2025) · cites this paper as Shove et al. 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M.
Venue
The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes
Published
2012
Pages
1-20
OpenAlex
W2494330206
Cited by
846
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 108 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
FWCI
278.13
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
social practices, practice change, everyday life, consumption, practice theory, competence, policy change, climate change, sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review