Cited by 72Food Safety and HygieneConsumer behavior in food and healthRisk Perception and Management

Food safety in everyday life: Shopping for vegetables in a rural city in Vietnam

Open access
Wertheim-Heck, Sigrid C.O., Spaargaren, Gert, Vellema, Sietze·2014·Journal of Rural Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.002

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wertheim-Heck, S. C. O., Spaargaren, G., & Vellema, S.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
35
Pages
37-48
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983693205
Cited by
72
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
food safety, wet markets, fresh food markets, trust, Vietnam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review