Cited by 367Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesCultural History and Identity FormationCultural and Mythological Studies

Understanding Material Culture

Woodward, Ian·2007·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

Arts, Education & Law Group, School of Humanities, Languages and Social Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781446278987

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in material culture show the contrary, they underscore the reciprocal shaping of inanimate things and people, essentially for social purposes.

    “Studies in material culture in fact show the contrary, they underscore the reciprocal shaping of inanimate things and people, essentially for social purposes.”

    From Pervious Drugs: Making the Pharmaceutical Object in Techno-Ayurveda (2014) · cites this paper as Woodward 2007

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodward, I.
Corresponding author
Woodward, Ian
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2007
OpenAlex
W613905734
Cited by
367
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.82
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Cultural History and Identity Formation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
Keywords
material culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review