Cited by 95Historical and Archaeological StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

From spectator to critic and participant: A new role for archaeology in ritual studies

Berggren, Åsa, Stutz, Liv Nilsson·2010·Journal of Social Archaeology

Abstract

In order to understand ritual in the past, archaeology has long relied on theories developed in other disciplines. While these theories, which often rely on written or oral information, have added many important dimensions to our interpretation of the archaeological record, they have often proven difficult to successfully articulate with the archaeological sources. Moreover, archaeology has tended to remain on the receiving end of the formulation of social theory, and has only rarely participated in the theoretical development and critique. In this article we argue that we see a central role for archaeology to contribute to the development of ritual theory. Through two case studies from Scandinavian prehistory we illustrate how the application of a practice-based ritual theory allows us to more firmly connect the theoretical framework to our archaeological sources. This connection not only leads us toward a synchronization of materials, methods and theories, but it also allows us to engage in the broader interdisciplinary theoretical discussion about ritual. The specific challenges posed by the archaeological sources and the archaeological process of interpretation point to new questions relating to the application of theoretical frameworks, and may even suggest some solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1469605310365039

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The separation of ritual from ordinary behaviors affords it a special status.

    “The separation of ritual from other ordinary, more mundane behaviors affords it a special status (Bell, 1997;Berggren & Stutz, 2010).”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Berggren & Stutz, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berggren, Å., & Stutz, L. N.
Affiliations
  • Sydsvensk Arkeologi (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Berggren, Åsa
  • Stutz, Liv Nilsson
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Published
2010-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
171-197
ISSN
  • 1469-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2951
OpenAlex
W2012715659
Cited by
95
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
72.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Archaeological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
ritual theory, Scandinavian prehistory, interdisciplinary theory, ritual interpretation, archaeological sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review