Cited by 70Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Representations and IdentityPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Knowing Thyself and Others: Progress in Metacognitive Social Psychology

Nelson, Thomas, Kruglanski, Arie, Jost, John·1998·Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781446279212.n5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ESAP is a psychometric tool grounded in Nelson et al.'s (1998) framework, evaluating interpersonal, leadership, self-management, and intrapersonal skills through 213 self-reported items.

    “The ESAP is a psychometric tool grounded in Nelson et al.'s (1998) framework, which evaluates interpersonal, leadership, self-management, and intrapersonal skills through 213 self-reported items (Nelson et al., 2017).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, T., Kruglanski, A., & Jost, J.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions
Published
1998
Pages
69-89
OpenAlex
W2497390715
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
metacognition, social cognition, self-knowledge, interpersonal perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review