The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discourse and Organization
Abstract
This text covers the areas of talk and action, stories and sensemaking, and discourse and social theory. It also evaluates organizational discourse as a means of enriching our understanding of organization
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281426 · Cited by 698
Self-citationLicense to critique: A communication perspective on sustainability standards
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2017) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.66 · Cited by 66
Wikimedia movement governance: the limits of a-hierarchical organization.
Jemielniak, D. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-07-2013-0138 · Cited by 51
Dawson, A., Brodie, P., Copeland, F., Rumsey, M., & Homer, C. (2014) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.009 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 1998
- OpenAlex
- W569144543
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
