Cited by 67Environmental Sustainability in BusinessCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

License to critique: A communication perspective on sustainability standards

Open access
Christensen, Lars Thøger, Morsing, Mette, Thyssen, Ole·2017·Business Ethics Quarterly

Abstract

Sustainability standards are important governance tools for addressing social and environmental challenges. Yet, such tools are often criticized for being either too open-ended or too restrictive, thereby failing to contribute significantly to the development of sustainable practices. Both dimensions of the critique, however, miss the point. While all standards in principle combine elements of openness and closure, both of which are necessary to keep the sustainability agenda relevant and adaptive, sustainability standards often operate in contexts that favor closure. In this article, we draw on a research tradition that views communication as constitutive of organization to emphasize the significance of communicative mechanisms that stimulate organizational openness in the application of standards. With the notion of “license to critique,” we present a managerial philosophy designed to involve managers and employees, mobilize and develop their knowledge about sustainability and bring it forward for the benefit of both the organization and the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/beq.2016.66

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The conditions for organizational talk to become action involve elements of participation and processual transparency.

    “The conditions for organizational talk to become action, accordingly, involves elements of participation (e.g., Deetz, 1992; see also Christensen et al., 2017) and processual transparency (Hood & Heald, 2006).”

    From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Christensen et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. R. 2014. Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational communication (3 rd ed.): 173-194.
  2. Christensen, L. T., Fırat, F., & Torp, S. 2008. The organization of integrated communica- tions: Toward flexible integration. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4): 423-452.
  3. Fransen, L. W., & Kolk, A. 2007. Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14(5): 667-684.
  4. Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (Eds.). 1998. Discourse + organization. London: Sage Publications.
  5. ---. 1995. Social systems. J. Bednarz, Jr. & D. Baeker (Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1984).
  6. March, J. G., & Simon, H.A. 1958. Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
  7. Rasche, A. 2009. Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(4): 192-205.
  8. Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Wickert, C., & de Bakker, F. 2015. Selling social issues: Uncovering managerial struggles during corporate social responsibility implementation. Paper presented at IABS Conference, Guanacaste, Costa Rica.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O.
Affiliations
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Venue
Business Ethics Quarterly
Published
2017-02-13
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
239-262
ISSN
  • 1052-150X (ISSN-L)
  • 2153-3326
OpenAlex
W2588342175
Cited by
66
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Business Ethics Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
sustainability standards, organizational communication, organizational openness, standards governance, management philosophy, knowledge mobilization, sustainable practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review