The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing and Writing Qualitative Research
Abstract
Approaching Qualitative Research Starting Out Showing the Workings What Counts as Data Writing about Data Writer Voice Writing about Relations Making Appropriate Claims
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On Becoming a Qualitative Researcher: The Value of Reflexivity
Watt, D. (2015) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1645 · Cited by 599
Issues in Teachers' Reinterpretation of a Task-Based Innovation in Primary Schools
Carless, D. (2004) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588283 · Cited by 464
The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong
Carless, D. (2007) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.09.003 · Cited by 313
Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools
Carless, D. R. (2003) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.03.002 · Cited by 293
Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21534 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Holliday, A.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2007
- OpenAlex
- W1636115385
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 89.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781446287958
- The paper
- Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
