The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics
Abstract
The authors collect together recent research findings in the professional development of teachers. New resources are provided to support the framework, principles & strategies of the first edition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004915 · Cited by 5,047
Desimone, L. M. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140 · Cited by 4,862
Professional Development and Teacher Change
Guskey, T. R. (2002) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/135406002100000512 · Cited by 3,403
The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10106 · Cited by 2,699
Metadata
- Authors
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P.
- Venue
- Corwin Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Corwin Press
- Published
- 2010
- OpenAlex
- W1499047121
- Cited by
- 2,531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 196.86
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781452219103
- The paper
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. (2010). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Corwin Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
