The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace “Revolution”
Abstract
'Politics As Usual' examines the effects of cyberspace on American politics. The Internet could empower citizens to challenge existing power structures, but the authors argue that the American system tends to normalise political activity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
Bimber, B. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615573 · Cited by 526
From “Third Place” to “Third Space”: Everyday Political Talk in Non-Political Online Spaces
Wright, S. (2012) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2012.11009088 · Cited by 142
Jiang, M., & Xu, H. (2009) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439308327313 · Cited by 96
Cyber-Libertarianism 2.0: A Discourse Theory/Critical Political Economy Examination
Dahlberg, L. (2010) · Cultural Politics · doi:10.2752/175174310x12750685679753 · Cited by 59
Bekmagambetov, A., Wagner, K. M., Gainous, J., Sabitov, Z., Rodionov, A., & Gabdulina, B. (2018) · Central Asian Survey · doi:10.1080/02634937.2018.1479374 · Cited by 46
Bucy, E. P., & Groshek, J. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817709281 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Margolis, M., & Resnick, D.
- Venue
- Sage eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2000
- OpenAlex
- W577253879
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
