Cited by 59Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesChaos, Complexity, and Education

Age Studies: A Sociological Examination of How We Age and are Aged through the Life Course

Open access
Pickard, Susan·2016·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

Some thoughts on education and political priorities SummaryAlthough we understand some systems well enough to make precise or statistical predictions, most interesting systems -whether physical, mental, cultural, or virtual -are complex, nonlinear, and have properties that emerge from feedback between many interactions.Exhaustive searches of all possibilities are impossible.Unfathomable and unintended consequences dominate.Problems cascade.Complex systems are hard to understand, predict and control.A growing fraction of the world has made a partial transition from a) small, relatively simple, hierarchical, primitive, zero-sum hunter-gatherer tribes based on superstition (almost total ignorance of complex systems), shared aims, personal exchange and widespread violence, to b) large, relatively complex, decentralised, technological, nonzero-sum market-based cultures based on science (increasingly accurate predictions and control in some fields), diverse aims, impersonal exchange, trade, private property, and (roughly) equal protection under the law.Humans have made transitions from numerology to mathematics, from astrology to astronomy, from alchemy to chemistry, from witchcraft to neuroscience, from tallies to quantum computation.However, while our ancestor chiefs understood bows, horses, and agriculture, our contemporary chiefs (and those in the media responsible for scrutiny of decisions) generally do not understand their equivalents, and are often less experienced in managi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781473957800

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The construct of age is omnipresent but theoretically underdeveloped in mainstream sociology.

    “The construct of age occupies a curious position in mainstream sociology: It is omnipresent but theoretically underdeveloped.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Pickard 2016

  • The discipline of sociology lacks full appreciation of the theoretical import of age.

    “I argue that the discipline of sociology lacks full appreciation of the theoretical import of age.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Pickard 2016

  • Age inequality is at the center of the interdisciplinary field of age studies.

    “Age inequality is at the center of the interdisciplinary field of age studies.”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Pickard 2016

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pickard, S.
Corresponding author
Pickard, Susan
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2482464320
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.98
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • CERN
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Keywords
aging, life course, sociology of aging, complex systems, nonlinear systems, prediction and control, unintended consequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review