The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential Ability Scales
Abstract
Validation studies address how comparable intelligence instruments are in the cognitive abilities they assess.Results derived from validation studies are used to make inferences as to how instruments are similar and how they differ regarding the abilities they are designed to measure.The purpose of this study is to conduct a validation study between two widely used intelligence instruments.This study will compare the Woodcock Johnson-III Tests of Cognitive Ability and the Differential Ability Scales.It is expected that convergent validity will be established between similar measures of each battery, whereas it is expected that discriminant validity will be established between dissimilar abilities within each instrument.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
García, E. J. (2017) · Revista Española de Pedagogía · doi:10.22550/2174-0909.3051 · Cited by 2,217
Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies
Eysenck, H. J. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90126-0 · Cited by 1,392
Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1967) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(67)90011-x · Cited by 1,331
Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues
Gallo, J. L. (2013) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/act011 · Cited by 1,254
Woodcock-Johnson psycho-Educational battery
Strein, W., & Brantley, J. (1981) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-4405(81)90061-3 · Cited by 767
Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_180723 · Cited by 726
Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice.
(1988) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10063-000 · Cited by 345
The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR) : Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment
McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 319
A process approach to neuropsychological assessment.
Kaplan, E. (2004) · Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice. · doi:10.1037/10063-004 · Cited by 302
The Three-Stratum Theory of Cognitive Abilities.
Carroll, J. B. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 294
Cited by
Satterstrom, F. K., Kosmicki, J. A., Wang, J., Breen, M. S., De Rubeis, S., An, J.-Y., Peng, M., Collins, R., Grove, J., Klei, L., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036 · Cited by 2,321
McGrew, K. S. (2009) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004 · Cited by 1,354
Disruptive CHD8 Mutations Define a Subtype of Autism Early in Development
Bernier, R., Golzio, C., Xiong, B., Stessman, H. A., Coe, B. P., Penn, O., Witherspoon, K., Gerdts, J., Baker, C., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.017 · Cited by 798
Cognitive Function at 3 Years of Age after Fetal Exposure to Antiepileptic Drugs
Meador, K. J., Baker, G. A., Browning, N., Clayton-Smith, J., Combs-Cantrell, D. T., Cohen, M., Kalayjian, L. A., Kanner, A., Liporace, J. D., Pennell, P. B., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0803531 · Cited by 812
Food Selectivity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Typically Developing Children
Bandini, L. G., Anderson, S. E., Curtin, C., Cermak, S., Evans, E. W., Scampini, R., Maslin, M., & Must, A. (2010) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.02.013 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Venue
- The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intellectual and Developmental Disorders
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2734667298
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 26
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Ability Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781483392271.n132
- The paper
- Differential Ability Scales. (2018). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Intellectual and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483392271.n132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
