The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Self-citationMadison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,346
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3 · Cited by 3,241
Mbti Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-briggs Type Indicator
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., & Most, R. B. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,783
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x · Cited by 2,183
Personality and the Prediction of Consequential Outcomes
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 · Cited by 2,170
Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory
Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2 · Cited by 2,077
Self-citationA new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.204 · Cited by 1,992
Higher-order factors of the Big Five.
Digman, J. M. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1246 · Cited by 1,839
Cited by
Comorbidity: a network perspective
Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09991567 · Cited by 1,575
Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science
Borsboom, D., Deserno, M. K., Rhemtulla, M., Epskamp, S., Fried, E. I., McNally, R. J., Robinaugh, D. J., Perugini, M., Dalege, J., Costantini, G., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w · Cited by 1,371
State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R
Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M., Mõttus, R., Waldorp, L. J., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003 · Cited by 982
How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories Be Evaluated?
Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310361240 · Cited by 659
Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide
Kievit, R. A., Frankenhuis, W. E., Waldorp, L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.
- Venue
- The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 1 — Personality Theories and Models
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 273-294
- OpenAlex
- W2502725678
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 48.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781849200462.n13
- The paper
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits. The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Volume 1 — Personality Theories and Models. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
