Cited by 3,241Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies.

Roberts, Brent W., DelVecchio, Wendy F.·2000·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

The present study used meta-analytic techniques to test whether trait consistency maximizes and stabilizes at a specific period in the life course. From 152 longitudinal studies, 3,217 test-retest correlation coefficients were compiled. Meta-analytic estimates of mean population test-retest correlation coefficients showed that trait consistency increased from .31 in childhood to .54 during the college years, to .64 at age 30, and then reached a plateau around .74 between ages 50 and 70 when time interval was held constant at 6.7 years. Analysis of moderators of consistency showed that the longitudinal time interval had a negative relation to trait consistency and that temperament dimensions were less consistent than adult personality traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personality traits can and do change across the entire life span.

    “Their relatively stable nature notwithstanding, personality traits can and do change across the entire life span.”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000

  • The rank-order stability of personality traits is far from perfect over moderately long intervals and decreases over increasingly long delays.

    “In fact, the rank-order stability of personality traits is far from perfect over moderately long intervals (Lucas & Donnellan, 2001; Wortman, Lucas, & Donnellan, 2012; Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000; though see Ferguson, 2010) and it decreases over increasingly long delays.”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000

  • Rank-order stability in measured personality increases steadily over the lifespan.

    “Rank-order stability in measured personality increases steadily over the lifespan.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Roberts and DelVecchio [2000]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2000-01
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
3-25
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2060999123
Cited by
3,241
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 179 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 205 · 2017: 162 · 2016: 189 · 2015: 156 · 2014: 182 · 2013: 183 · 2012: 179
FWCI
41.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
rank-order stability, test-retest correlation, child personality, temperament, age differences in personality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Development, Personality Tests, Temperament, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review