Cited by 1,992Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.

McAdams, Dan P., Pals, Jennifer L.·2006·American Psychologist

Abstract

Despite impressive advances in recent years with respect to theory and research, personality psychology has yet to articulate clearly a comprehensive framework for understanding the whole person. In an effort to achieve that aim, the current article draws on the most promising empirical and theoretical trends in personality psychology today to articulate 5 big principles for an integrative science of the whole person. Personality is conceived as (a) an individual's unique variation on the general evolutionary design for human nature, expressed as a developing pattern of (b) dispositional traits, (c) characteristic adaptations, and (d) self-defining life narratives, complexly and differentially situated (e) in culture and social context. The 5 principles suggest a framework for integrating the Big Five model of personality traits with those self-defining features of psychological individuality constructed in response to situated social tasks and the human need to make meaning in culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.204

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different approaches to personality generally assume that personality itself exists within the individual in an objective, third-person sense.

    “Regardless of their scope, however, different approaches to personality generally assume that personality itself exists within the individual in an ob jective, third-person sense.”

    From Self and identity in personality psychology (2021) · cites this paper as McAdams & Pals, 2006

  • Characteristic adaptations are more specific than dispositional traits and are contextualized in time, place, and/or social role.

    “The second layer consists of a wide assortment of motivational, social-cognitive, and developmental constructs that are more specific than dispositional traits and that are contextualized in time, place, and/or social role (McAdams, 2009; McAdams & Pals, 2006).”
  • Personality consists of three layers: dispositional traits, characteristic adaptations, and integrative life stories, evolving in a complex social and cultural context.

    “For any individual, personality is a unique arrangement of (1) dispositional traits, (2) characteristic adaptations, and (3) integrative life stories, evolving in a complex social and cultural context.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2006
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
204-217
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2078706391
Cited by
1,992
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 213 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 87
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Foley Family Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, dispositional traits, characteristic adaptations, human nature, meaning-making
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Personality, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review