The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Doing Critical Management Research
Abstract
An Introduction to Critical Research Alternative Social Science Research Perspectives Critical Overview of Quantitative and Conventional Qualitative Methodology The Critical Tradition Critical Theory and Postmodernism New Rules for Research A Framework for Critical Research Developing Critical Sensitivity in Management Research On the Practice of Critical Management Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Belfrage, C., & Hauf, F. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616663239 · Cited by 259
Leadership Development in Organizations: Multiple Discourses and Diverse Practice
Mabey, C. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00344.x · Cited by 128
Exploring the Gaps between Meanings and Practices of Gender Equity in a Sport Organization
Hoeber, L. (2007) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00342.x · Cited by 104
Gender Equity for Athletes: Multiple Understandings of an Organizational Value
Hoeber, L. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9320-3 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S.
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2000
- OpenAlex
- W1536953681
- Cited by
- 1,662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.55
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing Critical Management Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4135/9781849208918
- The paper
- Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research. SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
