The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Networks and Organizations
Abstract
This book is a straight forward and simple guide to understanding the theory of network analysis. In offering comprehensive review of the literature in light of the use of Social Network Analysis, Kilduff et. al offer a clean and succinct analysis of various network measures as a tool for better understanding organizations. In particular, the book is especially adept in pointing out how measures of social network analysis have commonly been misused and how such measures need to be framed within a study to produce a meaningful results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, social network ties are perforce, limited. This is because creating and maintaining social ties takes resources, such as time and cognitive load (Kilduff and Tsai 2003).”
From Enterprise System Implementation and Employee Job Performance: Understanding the Role of Advice Networks1 (2014) · cites this paper as Kilduff and Tsai 2003
In the citing paper
“we see social identification, the primary mechanism through which the processes enumerated in the foregoing sections operate, as foundational to all three forms of SC (cf.Ibarra et al. 2005;Kilduff and Cor-ley 1999;Kilduff and Tsai 2003;Tsai and Ghoshal 1998).”
From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Kilduff and Tsai 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015 · Cited by 4,006
What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096 · Cited by 3,297
TAKING STOCK OF NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J. J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159624 · Cited by 2,611
Self-citationRelational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
“, social capital); and the structural patterning of social life (Kilduff and Tsai, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluentialProvan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307302554 · Cited by 1,729
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W.
- ORCID
- Kilduff, Martin
- Venue
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W1510683253
- Cited by
- 1,581
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 90
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- social networks, organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
