The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Abstract
Assessments of management-induced changes in soil organic matter depend on the methods used to calculate the quantities of organic C and N stored in soils. Chemical analyses in the laboratory indicate the concentrations of elements in soils, but the thickness and bulk density of the soil layers in the field must be considered to estimate the quantities of elements per unit area. Conventional methods that calculate organic matter storage as the product of concentration, bulk density and thickness do not fully account for variations in soil mass. Comparisons between the quantities of organic C, N, P and S in Gray Luvisol soils under native aspen forest and various cropping systems were hampered by differences in the mass of soil under consideration. The influence of these differences was eliminated by calculating the masses of C, N, P and S in an "equivalent soil mass" (i.e. the mass of soil in a standard or reference surface layer). Reassessment of previously published data also indicated that estimates of organic matter storage depended on soil mass. Appraisals of organic matter depletion or accumulation usually were different for comparisons among element masses in an equivalent soil mass than for comparisons among element masses in genetic horizons or in fixed sampling depths. Unless soil erosion or deposition had altered the mass of topsoil per unit area, comparisons among unequal soil masses were unjustified and erroneous. For management-induced changes in soil organic matter and nutrient storage to be assessed reliably, the masses of soil being compared must be equivalent. Key words: Soil carbon, soil nitrogen, soil phosphorus, soil sulfur, carbon cycle, carbon storage, bulk density effects, Gray Luvisol, soil erosion
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To eliminate effects of sampling depth and SBD on soil P and SOC, data from the initial and 5-year samplings were recalculated on an equivalent mass basis assuming soil profile masses of 2500 and 10 000 Mg ha À1 following the method of Ellert & Bettany (1995).”
From Field-scale soil property changes under switchgrass managed for bioenergy (2011) · cites this paper as Ellert & Bettany (1995)
In the citing paper
“Equivalent mass SOC mean values were smaller in relation to volumetric SOC changes, a result of using the shallower sampling depth to account for variation in SBD (Ellert & Bettany, 1995).”
From Field-scale soil property changes under switchgrass managed for bioenergy (2011) · cites this paper as Ellert & Bettany, 1995
Citations
Cites
Post, W. M., Peng, T., Emanuel, W. R., King, A. W., Dale, V. H., & Deangelis, D. L. (1990) · American Scientist · Cited by 978
Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils
Davidson, E. A., & Ackerman, I. L. (1993) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00000786 · Cited by 927
Microbial biomass and mineralizable nitrogen distributions in no-tillage and plowed soils
Doran, J. W. (1987) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/bf00264349 · Cited by 341
The Changing carbon cycle : a global analysis
Trabalka, J. R., & Reichle, D. E. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 334
Changes in Soil Carbon Storage and Associated Properties with Disturbance and Recovery
Schlesinger, W. H. (1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1915-4_11 · Cited by 322
Tiessen, H., Stewart, J. W., & Bettany, J. R. (1982) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400050015x · Cited by 312
Self-citationPowlson, D. S., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1981) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600037084 · Cited by 285
Changes in the soil after clearing tropical forest
Nye, P. H., & Greenland, D. J. (1964) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf01373877 · Cited by 228
Comparative Analyses of Carbon Dynamics in Native and Cultivated Ecosystems
Buyanovsky, G. A., Kucera, C. L., & Wagner, G. H. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939893 · Cited by 182
Voroney, R. P., van Veen, J. A., & Paul, E. A. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss81-026 · Cited by 175
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – A meta-analysis
Poeplau, C., & Don, A. (2015) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024 · Cited by 1,651
Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 · Cited by 1,531
DON, A., SCHUMACHER, J., & FREIBAUER, A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x · Cited by 1,477
Murty, D., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Mcmurtrie, R. E., & Mcgilvray, H. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00459.x · Cited by 996
Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: An overview
Palm, C. A., Blanco‐Canqui, H., DeClerck, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2013) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.010 · Cited by 994
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1995-11-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-538
- ISSN
- 0008-4271 (ISSN-L)
- 1918-1841
- OpenAlex
- W2015262491
- Cited by
- 1,686
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- soil carbon, soil nitrogen, soil phosphorus, soil sulfur, bulk density, soil depth, soil erosion, soil deposition, cropping systems, Gray Luvisol, soil management, carbon cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
